patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: jiayu.hu@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragmented packets
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:14:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2034426.KlZ2vcFHjT@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220608095704.45375-1-kumaraparmesh92@gmail.com>

Jiayu, please could you review this patch?


08/06/2022 11:57, Kumara Parameshwaran:
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
> 
> A packet with RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG(0x300) contains both RTE_PTYPE_L4_TCP
> (0x100) & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP (0x200). A fragmented packet as defined in
> rte_mbuf_ptype.h cannot be recognized as other L4 types and hence the
> GRO layer should not use IS_IPV4_TCP_PKT or IS_IPV4_UDP_PKT for
> RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG. Hence, if the packet type is RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG the
> ip header should be parsed to recognize the appropriate IP type and
> invoke the respective gro handler.
> 
> Fixes: 1ca5e6740852 ("gro: support UDP/IPv4")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1:
> * Introduce IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT macro to check if fragmented packet and 
>   if true extract the IP header to identify the protocol type and 
>   invoke the appropriate gro handler. This is done for both 
>   rte_gro_reassemble and rte_gro_reassemble_burst APIs.
> v2,v3,v4:
> * Fix extra whitespace and column limit warnings
> 
>  lib/gro/rte_gro.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  lib/gro/rte_gro.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> index 6f7dd4d709..83d6e21dbb 100644
> --- a/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> +++ b/lib/gro/rte_gro.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static gro_tbl_pkt_count_fn tbl_pkt_count_fn[RTE_GRO_TYPE_MAX_NUM] = {
>  		((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) && \
>  		(RTE_ETH_IS_TUNNEL_PKT(ptype) == 0))
>  
> +#define IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype) && \
> +		((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG))
> +
>  #define IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype) && \
>  		((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) && \
>  		((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_VXLAN) == \
> @@ -240,7 +243,28 @@ rte_gro_reassemble_burst(struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
>  		 * The timestamp is ignored, since all packets
>  		 * will be flushed from the tables.
>  		 */
> -		if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> +		if (IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(pkts[i]->packet_type)) {
> +			struct rte_ipv4_hdr ip4h_copy;
> +			const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ip4h = rte_pktmbuf_read(pkts[i], pkts[i]->l2_len,
> +														sizeof(*ip4h), &ip4h_copy);
> +			if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP && do_udp4_gro) {
> +				ret = gro_udp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
> +							&udp_tbl, 0);
> +				if (ret > 0)
> +					nb_after_gro--;
> +				else if (ret < 0)
> +					unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			} else if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_TCP && do_tcp4_gro) {
> +				ret = gro_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
> +						&tcp_tbl, 0);
> +				if (ret > 0)
> +					nb_after_gro--;
> +				else if (ret < 0)
> +					unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			} else {
> +				unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			}
> +		} else if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
>  				do_vxlan_tcp_gro) {
>  			ret = gro_vxlan_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i],
>  							&vxlan_tcp_tbl, 0);
> @@ -349,7 +373,22 @@ rte_gro_reassemble(struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
>  	current_time = rte_rdtsc();
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
> -		if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
> +		if (IS_IPV4_FRAGMENT(pkts[i]->packet_type)) {
> +			struct rte_ipv4_hdr ip4h_copy;
> +			const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ip4h = rte_pktmbuf_read(pkts[i], pkts[i]->l2_len,
> +														sizeof(*ip4h), &ip4h_copy);
> +			if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_UDP && do_udp4_gro) {
> +				if (gro_udp4_reassemble(pkts[i], udp_tbl,
> +						current_time) < 0)
> +					unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			} else if (ip4h->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_TCP && do_tcp4_gro) {
> +				if (gro_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i], tcp_tbl,
> +						current_time) < 0)
> +					unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			} else {
> +				unprocess_pkts[unprocess_num++] = pkts[i];
> +			}
> +		} else if (IS_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP4_PKT(pkts[i]->packet_type) &&
>  				do_vxlan_tcp_gro) {
>  			if (gro_vxlan_tcp4_reassemble(pkts[i], vxlan_tcp_tbl,
>  						current_time) < 0)
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-19 11:18 [PATCH v1] gro: fix gro for UDP " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-03-20 10:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-06-08  9:46   ` [PATCH v3] gro: bug fix in identifying " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-06-08  9:57   ` [PATCH v4] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-06-09  8:14     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-06-09 14:19       ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-06-12  5:20     ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-06-17 11:33       ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-06-20  2:57         ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-06-20  5:23           ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-06-27 10:31   ` [PATCH v5] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-06-29  6:57     ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-07-05 16:30       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2034426.KlZ2vcFHjT@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).