From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yskoh@mellanox.com,
shahafs@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org, orika@mellanox.com,
pradeep@us.ibm.com, David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:50:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2107406.dfrop5AP8K@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552913893-43407-1-git-send-email-dekelp@mellanox.com>
18/03/2019 13:58, Dekel Peled:
> From previous patch description: "to improve performance on PPC64,
> use light weight sync instruction instead of sync instruction."
>
> Excerpt from IBM doc [1], section "Memory barrier instructions":
> "The second form of the sync instruction is light-weight sync,
> or lwsync.
> This form is used to control ordering for storage accesses to system
> memory only. It does not create a memory barrier for accesses to
> device memory."
>
> This patch removes the use of lwsync, so calls to rte_wmb() and
> rte_rmb() will provide correct memory barrier to ensure order of
> accesses to system memory and device memory.
>
> [1] https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/systems/articles/powerpc.html
>
> Fixes: d23a6bd04d72 ("eal/ppc: fix memory barrier for IBM POWER")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 12:58 Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 3:24 ` Chao Zhu
2019-03-19 10:05 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 19:42 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-19 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
[not found] ` <OF129065AB.1B264FB9-ON882583C3.00792656-882583C3.007C9172@notes.na.collabserv.com>
2019-03-21 8:49 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-28 22:50 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2107406.dfrop5AP8K@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).