From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3270A0C4D for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A2C4114C; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337274003D; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5015C00B0; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 07:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:09:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= Yb+IDSR80gRUhf0B7DbixGD02zem+2Pv3Xcde69J7qs=; b=b8lUgk/Ferrd0gC+ XswRn5y/bx3K6lHPGvSoBXH3aakb2O6IYVQdcVk2T0/qZeM0vHK1wV+NPsMmmE1F yilK1DzdiUL8qKPgyGixaCwa35gsL4b2tNBajAExvtZxAfV1vnMwJ7CepAe22Yu2 cGMjbmLvz7qV3/6+TFTNyZkmhlbzfaH0H+UAxIveul5JYrO/2k+POICIdPg/oOjL IGYGAIwkhAMKj1zn+wm2d3yvGoIpSznr2nv4CPIPVMHOVosE5c4TzmtzCR6ZVjBQ Nuf5LZfQqJI/0TQPthupM1117uUZ8Gcr6IsNzwmcNAnpeQYPtl8WP/vQJHkKQP2z cI40tg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Yb+IDSR80gRUhf0B7DbixGD02zem+2Pv3Xcde69J7 qs=; b=q6jmdYLzU3LyAqj0mlDic65SjFLAhlZlBd+aFSFH+L7SoDnXsAvNdBRY8 PSMaPmQCK5zZt1JXEzlncPfHbntdTIq7brN4phHfGLFj95+muM++JzEmQuOz2Hgz tzFd3Eqp2klCn304I7+vJG/pOupMCXfpAQXODX/bZ71pIlCtLCqhQ2njzzK4/xHU T37T/kK3KYLn309yp8IhCF8MJ4b0YCpRDxG0r2wZy9lW29Eepaxa1sOM00oQpst6 8CPbLWYZmLl2R/oy9RJ3tZ0QYLcSWw2eIoomNH3+CaAlwbJ/drKAT6O1V3FbT4PB bQDHmGuGJYjVHvRgMENealxgezqyw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddriedvgdefvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 07:09:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: matan@nvidia.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, Raslan Darawsheh , Rongwei Liu Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:09:06 +0200 Message-ID: <2220126.5qsbnr2OsU@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210802102627.548015-1-rongweil@nvidia.com> References: <20210802102627.548015-1-rongweil@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix vni matching with non-std port X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 02/08/2021 12:26, Rongwei Liu: > In the recent update, the misc5 matcher was introduced to > match VxLAN header extra fields. However, ConnectX-5 > doesn't support misc5 for the UDP ports different from > VXLAN's standard one (4789). > > Need to fall back to the previous approach and use legacy > misc matcher if non-standard UDP port is recognized > in VxLAN flow. The title should mention the scope, i.e. VXLAN on ConnectX-5