From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: prohibit polling of a stopped queue
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:30:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2298145.NG923GbCHz@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220410213550.1733330-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
10/04/2022 23:35, Dmitry Kozlyuk:
> Whether it is allowed to call Rx/Tx functions for a stopped queue
> was undocumented. Some PMDs make this behavior a no-op
> either by explicitly checking the queue state
> or by the way how their routines are implemented or HW works.
>
> No-op behavior may be convenient for application developers.
> But it also means that pollers of stopped queues
> would go all the way down to PMD Rx/Tx routines, wasting cycles.
> Some PMDs would do a check for the queue state on data path,
> even though it may never be needed for a particular application.
> Also, use cases for stopping queues or starting them deferred
> do not logically require polling stopped queues.
>
> Use case 1: a secondary that was polling the queue has crashed,
> the primary is doing a recovery to free all mbufs.
> By definition the queue to be restarted is not polled.
>
> Use case 2: deferred queue start or queue reconfiguration.
> The polling thread must be synchronized anyway,
> because queue start and stop are non-atomic.
>
> Prohibit calling Rx/Tx functions on stopped queues.
>
> Fixes: 0748be2cf9a2 ("ethdev: queue start and stop")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
> ---
> This patch is was originally a part of the series:
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220307125351.697936-3-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com/
> The discussion there is summarized in the commit message.
[...]
> * rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()), it must call rte_eth_dev_stop() first to stop the
> * device and then do the reconfiguration before calling rte_eth_dev_start()
> * again. The transmit and receive functions should not be invoked when the
> - * device is stopped.
> + * device is stopped or when the queue is stopped (for that queue).
I think we can make it simpler:
The transmit and receive functions should not be invoked when the device
or the queue is stopped.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-10 21:35 Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-04-11 8:17 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-04-25 8:30 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-05-25 10:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2298145.NG923GbCHz@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).