From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"ajitkhaparde@gmail.com" <ajitkhaparde@gmail.com>,
"dpdk stable" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Ajit Khaparde" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: fix reset on mbuf free
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 10:47:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3026375.dAcfTszmW5@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB375341639BF91CB416CF88ECDFA30@DM6PR12MB3753.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
What's the follow-up for this patch?
19/01/2021 15:04, Slava Ovsiienko:
> Hi, All
>
> Could we postpose this patch at least to rc2? We would like to conduct more investigations?
>
> With best regards, Slava
>
> From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:52:32PM +0000, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > (Sorry had to resend this to some recipients due to mail server problems).
> > >
> > > Just confirming that I can still reproduce the regression with single core and
> > 64B frames on other servers.
> >
> > Many thanks for the feedback. Can you please detail what is the amount of
> > performance loss in percent, and confirm the test case? (I suppose it is
> > testpmd io forward).
> >
> > Unfortunatly, I won't be able to spend a lot of time on this soon (sorry for
> > that). So I see at least these 2 options:
> >
> > - postpone the patch again, until I can find more time to analyze
> > and optimize
> > - apply the patch if the performance loss is acceptable compared to
> > the added value of fixing a bug
> >
> > Regards,
> > Olivier
> >
[...]
> > > > Assuming that pw86457 doesn't have an effect on this test, it looks
> > > > to me that this patch caused a regression in Intel hardware as well.
> > > >
> > > > Can someone update the baseline's expected values for the Intel NICs
> > > > and rerun the test on this patch?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ali
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-24 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 17:00 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] " Olivier Matz
2020-11-05 0:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-11-05 7:46 ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-05 8:33 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2020-11-05 9:03 ` Olivier Matz
2020-11-05 9:09 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-11-08 7:25 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-12-18 12:52 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2020-12-18 13:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2020-12-18 23:33 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-01-06 13:33 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Olivier Matz
2021-01-10 9:28 ` Ali Alnubani
2021-01-11 13:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-01-13 13:27 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Olivier Matz
2021-01-15 13:59 ` David Marchand
2021-01-15 18:39 ` Ali Alnubani
2021-01-18 17:52 ` Ali Alnubani
2021-01-19 8:32 ` Olivier Matz
2021-01-19 8:53 ` Morten Brørup
2021-01-19 12:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-19 12:27 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2021-01-19 14:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-19 14:21 ` Morten Brørup
2021-01-21 9:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-19 14:04 ` [dpdk-stable] " Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-24 8:47 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-07-30 12:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2021-07-30 14:35 ` Morten Brørup
2021-07-30 14:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-30 15:14 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-30 15:23 ` Morten Brørup
2021-01-21 9:19 ` [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-21 9:29 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Morten Brørup
2021-01-21 16:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2021-01-23 8:57 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] " Morten Brørup
2021-01-25 17:00 ` Brandon Lo
2021-01-25 18:42 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdklab] RE: [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-15 13:56 ` [dpdk-stable] " Morten Brørup
2021-09-29 21:37 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Olivier Matz
2021-09-30 13:27 ` Ali Alnubani
2021-10-21 9:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3026375.dAcfTszmW5@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=ajitkhaparde@gmail.com \
--cc=akozyrev@nvidia.com \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).