From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070BF2C49; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2017 07:52:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,136,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="1120509590" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.86.60]) ([10.255.86.60]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2017 07:52:27 -0800 To: Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org References: <1488465648-27351-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> Cc: Ivan Malov , stable@dpdk.org From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <30dee34d-3c74-5d9e-14ad-df5ed1ef4e3e@intel.com> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 15:52:26 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1488465648-27351-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/sfc: set multicast address list in started state only X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:52:30 -0000 On 3/2/2017 2:40 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > From: Ivan Malov > > According to 'libefx' API requirements, one is allowed to > apply multicast address list to the port in started state > only, otherwise the new array should be copied to a local > storage in order to be applied during the next port start > > Fixes: 0fa0070e4391 ("net/sfc: support multicast addresses list controls") > Coverity issue: 141296 > > Fixes: e9ddf37a507d ("net/sfc: fix setting empty multicast list") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lee > Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton Hi Andrew, This patch does not apply clean to next-net because of other sfc patches get first. Can you please rebase the patch to latest next-net? Thanks, ferruh