From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A8D41BE7 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 08:43:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0376340E03; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 08:43:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587B340A7D; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 08:43:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7F332007D7; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 02:43:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Feb 2023 02:43:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1675669408; x= 1675755808; bh=iYoMxFtmF2YwJ6Q0hcuq+pSElx0A81McgMCQEerYps0=; b=i ZbwYTSNEgDoJr/LP4YjxeAoQ3jLaftvQM+lNa/J0gyqFgye9KEapDu8GBnHMa9bt SKspzM6ZgEf1fyKvd5Cr9PuJrhgTbJK11nmMujqyLF9ByvwjSVPzSFklqyiJU1Q6 pWVo/eJCEzz6Fjn7aXT9qDuzkd9MzP6UKJn806nd7DzgqHRicTTrbm5XAbugoQwn m0xqbZePuOT9Ge0C6DY9tkxU5BDSrOJsfnrlWkq0OMHO+ButMICbiZ6SF+Pa4B1F EZPE1UbRPGb/JtQhpvyUX9pnGsFz17qyCDjaOf9ISfKFZ4uvZxv1fNTXc/NuTFfy LQPc6p96YqLOWcaBY4S6w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675669408; x= 1675755808; bh=iYoMxFtmF2YwJ6Q0hcuq+pSElx0A81McgMCQEerYps0=; b=j aPS0nyk8ehKtajm8ziN3o4PD0HQ96E80cNHI7hnVADV0o2SmZ8eBgYOZRMjx+xWK J5SrCaktlqzjl/lnrjjGUlbUIzxkGMV+WoeXy3/4tvdITUnc89Hwq3MYp5q+2zqG TWHi61HUUwd2Cq6kzhrFOoWPicHEsbtT9+ESRmwbgmew1yKzmJGomSXJOnROrmLi hD69aT2Z/2qKbAp5HewOvYuyxuUTNj1XXSOl7rD2dNHXV31ZO8mRfdaa6T43vRWf D2bPrxacAnf7mXUU1qruAoDZjqUfWlyN3ld2TjzXf6HAtWjqoLZUwWvyJDo3ccwK aDCFZBI0ktKO4TovnAtag== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeghedguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 02:43:27 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Megha Ajmera Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, jasvinder.singh@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, marcinx.danilewicz@intel.com, David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix for tc_ov_enable flag position in subport structure. Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 08:43:25 +0100 Message-ID: <3205880.oiGErgHkdL@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230109145448.278463-1-megha.ajmera@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org 10/01/2023 12:27, David Marchand: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:59 PM Megha Ajmera wrote: > > > > Current position of "tv_ov_enable" variable in > > tc_ov_enabled* > > > > rte_sched_subport structure makes the "memory" variable unused. > > I did not enter the beast... but my understanding is that some object > internal to rte_sched_subport currently shares location with this > tc_ov_enabled field. > So please find a better title and describe the impact. > > > > > > Fixes: f5e60154ade ("sched: enable traffic class oversubscription conditionally") > > CC: marcinx.danilewicz@intel.com > > This is stable@dpdk.org material, isn't it? > > > > Signed-off-by: Megha Ajmera Ping Please update or the patch will be abandoned. Jasvinder, Cristian, can you help?