From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C963743B34 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:13:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF193402E5; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:13:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.157]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEE34021D; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:13:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C439F1800097; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:13:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:13:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1708280030; x=1708366430; bh=uRkewBTKHM/6DDbovbCsJZgeuohkgMN7ua6azsaNX30=; b= AmAg6nCxV2fYik8NKCHfWZGUr5FIIjCnVNZtS7Ml7wfZxWtkwOmUjNodHPo2BpsY vmpuUDlBmxCCoptObJ5y/BviTMn+x+DFYdjtxAb3p+6jl+jYrYmUBug+8YKwdqgn 6S4aZPNHp2gyNBExpUUxw4n2Nkc4IR/izo2jhmK9/cn9GM19OVaFpyGyMWBe3Yxd EMI0fPQfG50kDfZoQ3ax+pZaIdEKXTHZvgCKB6+N29ILQ+k7GB3N7ber5Ivi0YU6 jeaahnb9qtCwzWcshbyq2tcQGAhB1//guvMuPue9C6NQdtybuQW+M8fradCI7P65 w4JyzCkdqNKcex9PRFEMIg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1708280030; x= 1708366430; bh=uRkewBTKHM/6DDbovbCsJZgeuohkgMN7ua6azsaNX30=; b=B 8GE91tFNP2qB0wy2rn3iT18Hr0lMpEAGwsd8q1kvTLHBTwyRcx3rNDkrHdePd0Q2 hgqFvVRENvUvWikfUnz3xoEZ62BtQvWC/lN9EnIGaUcJErHzLkmKZPQ6tyEtHUW3 RZEqBeLLVY1/aCLZaGGwY+yJChere4BjnI4KsbVeq+phJS8sgaZWrFDF+a7oVTM0 YcF8pw8knKObFROsx4Nj0QaK0fs1HTmg/6l1vJlX718AMzq9xZhECD6G17gmQ57t gintQtlCaJOUjdzT99idmacHJeWr26l2qrPaYZ10qFs1px4sfAkKoaIx7qALpYPD XB3DZzSeLhsMYjRlKoZbA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeigdduuddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:13:49 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa Nagarahalli , Nathan Brown Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, wathsala.vithanage@arm.com, dhruv.tripathi@arm.com, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu: use correct value of acked token in debug print Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:13:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3321949.vCJZsxu672@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20240205045949.1085128-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> References: <20240205045949.1085128-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20240205045949.1085128-2-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org 05/02/2024 05:59, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > Debug print should use acked token value that was used for comparison. > > Fixes: bf386ae377aa ("rcu: add additional debug logs") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Reported-by: Nathan Brown > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Nathan Brown We trust you about RCU :) Series applied, thanks.