From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
<dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 11:05:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3675ce78-c1a8-6dc9-a5f4-7edb2a00f9e0@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114e227-69ba-19b2-16d2-48be5399fb04@huawei.com>
On 5/11/2022 3:16 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
<...>
>>>>>> @@ -609,8 +658,25 @@ eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>>>> static int
>>>>>> eth_dev_stop_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - if (is_proc_primary())
>>>>>> - return rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (is_proc_primary()) {
>>>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>>>
>>>>> Here and in other places - probably no need to pollute the code
>>>>> with all these 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>>>>> I suppose this logic (for checking is bonding API present or not)
>>>>> can be hidden inside change_bonding_slave_port_status() itself.
>>>>>
>>>> I think it does not pollute the code. anyone can tell according to
>>>> the flag 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>>>> if hiddle inside 'change_bonding_slave_port_status', it will be weird.
>>>> For example, if the port is not bonding port, It will also invoke
>>>> 'change_bonding_slave_port_status'. That is unreasonable.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Konstantin,
>>>
>>> I also was not happy to have bonding (or any PMD) ifdef in the
>>> generic (start()/stop()) functions, but the ifdef blocks updates
>>> testpmd (application) level status. So that can't be handled in the
>>> PMD and need to be in the application level.
>>> Which is enforcing to have same PMD specific code in the testpmd level,
>>> if you have any suggestion to prevent this, I am for it.
>>
>>
>> I am not aking to move it to PMD.
>> What I am saying that this ifdef logic could be grouped in one place
>> (inside change_bonding_slave_port_status()) instead of spreading it
>> around multiple places.
>>
>
> Hi, Konstantin,
> fixed in v4, thanks.
Hi Conor,
What do you think to apply same on patch 4/5?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211025063922.34066-1-humin29@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20220324030036.4761-1-humin29@huawei.com>
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] net/bonding: fix non-active slaves aren't stopped Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-26 18:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-29 6:45 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-29 13:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-03 6:54 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 19:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-05 1:16 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] net/bonding: fix non-terminable while loop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-26 18:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-29 6:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-29 13:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] app/testpmd: fix slave device isn't released Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-30 6:01 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-30 10:21 ` Singh, Aman Deep
[not found] ` <20220503100217.46203-1-humin29@huawei.com>
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net/bonding: fix non-active slaves aren't stopped Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] net/bonding: fix non-terminable while loop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 23:39 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-06 8:16 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-08 11:28 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-10 16:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-10 21:48 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-11 2:16 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-11 10:05 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-05-11 2:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-11 22:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-19 7:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] app/testpmd: fix slave device isn't released Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-01 17:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-07 8:15 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-07 8:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Dongdong Liu
2022-06-07 14:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-09 7:50 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-09 8:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-09 11:20 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-09 11:49 ` [PATCH v5] " Dongdong Liu
2022-06-10 8:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ethdev: fix dev state when stop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-25 17:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-26 10:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-30 12:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3675ce78-c1a8-6dc9-a5f4-7edb2a00f9e0@xilinx.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).