From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6AA42A97 for ; Mon, 8 May 2023 17:24:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB42042D2F; Mon, 8 May 2023 17:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43ACF40685 for ; Mon, 8 May 2023 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683559443; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cEQqrI3h2tgNCW1M3VJqY8yIZlZg5zqqLfos4J1lIMY=; b=CYTijNAIVaJZba/Qp/DPvUeuQaNqODV02YjprgvvHppNvOEQWrn+i6RbZJsRxRk2EPJhm/ TPk/HEl27zfairpKgFh4mTbuV7r5/m6XC1Ok4W5M2rVZy81oPjy+aiZrR4rBV7MqF7H1rT KOcIkqN7grJN0lWfYgH5+fhG3KaFP6o= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-592--MdGialrM06p6PyVBAwelA-1; Mon, 08 May 2023 11:24:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -MdGialrM06p6PyVBAwelA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f33f8ffa37so17408375e9.2 for ; Mon, 08 May 2023 08:24:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683559441; x=1686151441; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cEQqrI3h2tgNCW1M3VJqY8yIZlZg5zqqLfos4J1lIMY=; b=aLehPzF/IL4zMdIgplYTztyxyUFtu4BRv/jkFSrSJrNQu7aqdIEsd8xEhVclNXxsfb zqEA5030qrW5Tsp4lcUgG5vU0Ws6gpkg0eqnlr9GbmX3H6YPnE1HzySkhXg7pvjev4b3 Zj662oVhVeloffu8P6Fsx06noPBS+AmDdoCnoD9BAwahrVTCqXorbLXifbqyCNqcX+Y6 SP33j9D2HkET8LfoznYGnyqGFCDq4qbwAGTmUFq4QsYjpJNxxMakwMtiVMlww+iVqcpk r4b8J4QIpFAa5ny2cJW5nd1T50GEIPH8aJmV9AcXHIutMYHkimNVlRTjNIi7FOgIRug8 i8RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxVc/zKF6wtFMvcZNxFNPYVJfUOJ/y06hHUxFyMmYleXAKe+Nym gEcQcVxFwmdLigkfZNdq4FGBd245UnZ8dkJ85HQ9LhY5EPXMmQQp2iYS9MivfbzMApp6KLpZQJw f5ZUm1as= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc87:0:b0:3f1:830a:a345 with SMTP id p7-20020a7bcc87000000b003f1830aa345mr7264914wma.11.1683559440875; Mon, 08 May 2023 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4yXjKyPezyn3x4qQR2aq1+9nuxzRYua+s8e+4guWva60qX3X/pM3sbvYenzH/W53WzEKIjgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc87:0:b0:3f1:830a:a345 with SMTP id p7-20020a7bcc87000000b003f1830aa345mr7264895wma.11.1683559440566; Mon, 08 May 2023 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.36] ([78.19.110.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1-20020a1cc901000000b003f25b40fc24sm17293370wmb.6.2023.05.08.08.23.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 May 2023 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37eb3699-24fa-f46e-59bf-bea99007bd03@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 16:23:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 To: "Xu, HailinX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Cc: "Stokes, Ian" , "Mcnamara, John" , Luca Boccassi , "Xu, Qian Q" , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20230406113734.261672-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> <630da282-4ce1-4e2c-b6f7-7c333c51da2c@redhat.com> <34c532ab-e66c-af60-2c79-40a6f16bd7ed@redhat.com> From: Kevin Traynor Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On 05/05/2023 02:42, Xu, HailinX wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Traynor >> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 6:11 PM >> To: Xu, HailinX ; stable@dpdk.org >> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Mcnamara, John >> ; Luca Boccassi ; Xu, Qian Q >> ; Thomas Monjalon ; Peng, >> Yuan ; Chen, Zhaoyan ; >> dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test >> >> On 04/05/2023 03:13, Xu, HailinX wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Kevin Traynor >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:35 PM >>>> To: Xu, HailinX ; stable@dpdk.org >>>> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Mcnamara, John >>>> ; Luca Boccassi ; Xu, Qian >>>> Q ; Thomas Monjalon ; >> Peng, >>>> Yuan ; Chen, Zhaoyan ; >>>> dev@dpdk.org >>>> Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>> >>>> On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote: >>>>> On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote: >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Xu, HailinX >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM >>>>>>> To: Kevin Traynor ; stable@dpdk.org >>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe >>>> ; >>>>>>> Ali Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >>>>>>> ; David Christensen >>>>>>> ; Hemant Agrawal >>>> ; >>>>>>> Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob >>>>>>> ; Mcnamara, John ; >>>>>>> Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Luca Boccassi >>>>>>> ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>>>>>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; >>>> Thomas >>>>>>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>>>>>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>>>>>> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Kevin Traynor >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM >>>>>>>> To: stable@dpdk.org >>>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe >>>>>>>> ; Ali Alnubani >>>>>>>> ; Walker, Benjamin >>>>>>>> ; David Christensen >>>>>>>> ; Hemant Agrawal >>>>>>>> ; Stokes, Ian ; >>>>>>>> Jerin Jacob ; Mcnamara, John >>>>>>>> ; Ju-Hyoung Lee >> ; >>>>>>>> Kevin Traynor ; Luca Boccassi >>>>>>>> ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>>>>>>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; >>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>>>>>>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>>>>>>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and >>>>>>>> report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the >>>>>>>> final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to >>>>>>>> the >>>> release notes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>>>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kevin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HI All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 >>>>>>> validation test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. >>>>>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >>>>>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >>>>>>> 1. >>>> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >>>>>>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >>>>>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet >>>>>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under >>>> investigating >>>>>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>>>>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with >>>>>>> latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >>>>>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, >>>>>>> RHEL8.4, FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>>>>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>>>>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >>>>>>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced >> RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >>>>>>> Descriptor, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including >>>>>>> PF/VF single core performance test, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library >>>>>>> basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >>>>>>> - On going. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >>>>>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >>>>>>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >>>>>>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. found bug1. >>>>>>> * Cryptodev: >>>>>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API >>>>>>> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >>>>>>> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. >>>>>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >>>>>>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >>>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Xu, Hailin >>>>>> Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 >>>>>> all >>>> validation. No critical issue is found. >>>>> >>>>> Hi. Thanks for testing. >>>>> >>>>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >>>>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >>>>>> 1. >>>> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >>>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >>>>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only >>>>>> the specified platform exists >>>>> >>>>> Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear >>>>> from the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] >>>>> in >>>>> 20.11 is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11). >>>>> >>>>> Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for >>>>> previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS >>>>> releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on? >>>>> >>>>> [0] >>>>> commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff >>>>> Author: Mattias Rönnblom >>>>> Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200 >>>>> >>>>> net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines >>>>> >>>>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under >>>>>> investigating >>>>> >>>>> ok, thank you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop >>>> issue was not the same as 20.11. >>>> >>>> Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a >>>> regression introduced since in 21.11.4 ? >>> >>> Found bad commit id: >>> commit c41493361c87e730459ead9311c68528eb0874aa >>> Author: Boleslav Stankevich >>> Date:   Fri Mar 3 14:19:29 2023 +0300 >>>     net/virtio: deduce IP length for TSO checksum >>> >>> We try this issue on 3 different platforms Performance drop only found >>> on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8280M CPU @ 2.70GHz CPU. >>> >> >> Ok, thanks for reporting. This commit was also in 23.03 and 20.11.8 so not sure >> if they were tested on this platform? >> > Yes, But 23.03 doesn't have such issue on the same platform > ok, thanks. >> This commit fixes a functional issue, so I don't think it should be removed unless >> it is critical issue. >> >> There's no update on other performance report. Release is already 1 week >> overdue, is there critical issues that we should hold release for? >> > No other issues found > I'm not fully clear on the status, so let's separate. There were two reported issues. 1. Performance drop on specific Intel platform. - Is this being investigated by Intel dev? - Is it is a release blocking issue ? 2. Virtio issue caused by commit c41493361c87e730459ead9311c68528eb0874aa Author: Boleslav Stankevich Date: Fri Mar 3 14:19:29 2023 +0300 net/virtio: deduce IP length for TSO checksum - Is this being investigated by Intel dev? - Is it is a release blocking issue ? thanks, Kevin. > Regards, > Xu, Hailin > >> thanks, >> Kevin. >> >>> Regards, >>> Xu, Hailin >>> >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Kevin, >>>> >>>>> Kevin. >>>>> >>>>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>>>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with >>>>>> latest >>>> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >>>>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, >>>>>> RHEL8.4, >>>> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >>>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >>>> Descriptor, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including >>>>>> PF/VF >>>> single core performance test, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library >>>>>> basic test - >>>> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> >>>>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >>>>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >>>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >>>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. found bug1. >>>>>> * Cryptodev: >>>>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API >>>> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. found bug2. >>>>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >>>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >>>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Xu, Hailin >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >