From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
<stable@dpdk.org>, Xueqin Lin <xueqin.lin@intel.com>,
Zhihong Peng <zhihongx.peng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mem: fix ASan shadow for remapped memory segments
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:47:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <419bb7fc-cb04-10cf-a40a-5dba39323f9e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415173127.3838-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On 15-Apr-22 6:31 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> When releasing some memory, the allocator can choose to return some
> pages to the OS. At the same time, this memory was poisoned in ASAn
> shadow. Doing the latter made it impossible to remap this same page
> later.
> On the other hand, without this poison, the OS would pagefault in any
> case for this page.
>
> Remove the poisoning for unmapped pages.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 994
> Fixes: 6cc51b1293ce ("mem: instrument allocator for ASan")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/common/malloc_elem.h | 4 ++++
> lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/malloc_elem.h b/lib/eal/common/malloc_elem.h
> index 228f178418..b859003722 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/malloc_elem.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/malloc_elem.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ old_malloc_size(struct malloc_elem *elem)
>
> #else /* !RTE_MALLOC_ASAN */
>
> +static inline void
> +asan_set_zone(void *ptr __rte_unused, size_t len __rte_unused,
> + uint32_t val __rte_unused) { }
> +
> static inline void
> asan_set_freezone(void *ptr __rte_unused, size_t size __rte_unused) { }
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c b/lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> index 6c572b6f2c..5913d9f862 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> @@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ malloc_heap_free(struct malloc_elem *elem)
> size_t len, aligned_len, page_sz;
> struct rte_memseg_list *msl;
> unsigned int i, n_segs, before_space, after_space;
> + bool unmapped_pages = false;
> int ret;
> const struct internal_config *internal_conf =
> eal_get_internal_configuration();
> @@ -999,6 +1000,13 @@ malloc_heap_free(struct malloc_elem *elem)
>
> /* don't care if any of this fails */
> malloc_heap_free_pages(aligned_start, aligned_len);
> + /*
> + * Clear any poisoning in ASan for the associated pages so that
> + * next time EAL maps those pages, the allocator can access
> + * them.
> + */
> + asan_set_zone(aligned_start, aligned_len, 0x00);
> + unmapped_pages = true;
>
> request_sync();
> } else {
> @@ -1032,7 +1040,9 @@ malloc_heap_free(struct malloc_elem *elem)
>
> rte_mcfg_mem_write_unlock();
> free_unlock:
> - asan_set_freezone(asan_ptr, asan_data_len);
> + /* Poison memory range if belonging to some still mapped pages. */
> + if (!unmapped_pages)
> + asan_set_freezone(asan_ptr, asan_data_len);
>
> rte_spinlock_unlock(&(heap->lock));
> return ret;
I suspect the patch should be a little more complicated than that. When
we unmap pages, we don't necessarily unmap the entire malloc element, it
could be that we have a freed allocation like so:
| malloc header | free space | unmapped space | free space | next malloc
header |
So, i think the freezone should be set from asan_ptr till aligned_start,
and then from (aligned_start + aligned_len) till (asan_ptr +
asan_data_len). Does that make sense?
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220415173127.3838-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-04-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] test/mem: disable ASan when accessing unallocated mem David Marchand
2022-04-20 14:48 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-04-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] mem: fix ASan shadow for remapped memory segments David Marchand
2022-04-20 14:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2022-04-21 9:37 ` David Marchand
2022-04-21 9:50 ` David Marchand
2022-04-21 13:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-04-26 12:54 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-04-26 14:15 ` David Marchand
2022-04-26 16:07 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-04-27 15:32 ` Burakov, Anatoly
[not found] ` <20220505092952.11818-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-05-05 9:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] test/mem: disable ASan when accessing unallocated mem David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=419bb7fc-cb04-10cf-a40a-5dba39323f9e@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xueqin.lin@intel.com \
--cc=zhihongx.peng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).