From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5F2A00E6 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B55B29D2; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4EA2082; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C19021EBC; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 03:22:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:22:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=dn81nZMeunSr/LUZTWGGrfzvkxbQJ4MRTN1RQV88Cuo=; b=k11ctBIiIgWs cegfyBqJXXXqyIVRvrBy/efgwSDV6F23quK86eR82RfmTCgjZ+0oKsvuLdlu8Z76 YUZpX+CL8M7KC0PmvTewm4WrFBBwhvZjp1uMcwv7ofmjHhcoYviixF7BcslNlXwq KpfeQnXh8TEw4WHU0HjEBbWnLykJJeQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=dn81nZMeunSr/LUZTWGGrfzvkxbQJ4MRTN1RQV88C uo=; b=DiFGDFs6dIoSL724Qhjysv7gu7YeTYtgduM5Bi0cBSGJPjQfGZ6Zlw/xF UfgWZM5BzlsAPjY4DobwpZt9EoTus9bFE35iomNoC0tHWzugjMikgv7TYyGJ20u5 BqKucbhWQzzPHrKmNgAL6BDMfD36MEz8BenBvJZ+FxDxrqEzkjoIkPAMk1VoUFX4 9XpnqrAF2AHLlbBIZssI9Y6pIMKkz7eCSuY8+6aUBfEsMGN8aFPTSJ6bMjA3v0HF Mr6OjwAOZ0NuaQkp5VDyXZFcxkZolH7k9V1cDoQa+YzT/bIrw5Aoh3IQORYE+Ww9 hYrxgpaMiduXa/omkA1D3OAjPo/Eg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddruddugedgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeelfedriedrudegledruddugeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AF45380069; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 03:22:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Akhil Goyal Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Bernard Iremonger , "dev@dpdk.org" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:22:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4252912.OkXEp6FMEK@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1565181012-19553-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix unchecked return value X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 07/08/2019 15:39, Akhil Goyal: > > > > > Check the return value of the rte_eth_dev_rss_hash_conf_get function. > > > > Coverity issue: 344970 > > Fixes: 3a690d5a65e2 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: fix first packet with inline crypto") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger > > --- > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > > Thomas, > Could you please take this patch directly to master. It doesn't look critical at all. Why do you want this in DPDK 19.08 without enough time for proper validation testing?