* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
@ 2021-09-13 11:06 Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 14:08 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2021-09-13 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: anatoly.burakov, david.marchand, Bruce Richardson, stable
Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
index 408f054f7a..4a8d87c23e 100644
--- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
+++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void)
RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not open "CONTIGMEM_DEV"\n");
return -1;
}
+ if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX) < 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not lock memory. Is another DPDK process running?\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
if (buffer_size >= 1<<30)
RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Contigmem driver has %d buffers, each of size %dGB\n",
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 11:06 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
` (2 more replies)
2021-09-13 14:08 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
1 sibling, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Burakov, Anatoly @ 2021-09-13 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson, dev; +Cc: david.marchand, stable
On 13-Sep-21 12:06 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
> mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
> using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
> issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
> processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
>
> Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> index 408f054f7a..4a8d87c23e 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void)
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not open "CONTIGMEM_DEV"\n");
> return -1;
> }
> + if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX) < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not lock memory. Is another DPDK process running?\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> if (buffer_size >= 1<<30)
> RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Contigmem driver has %d buffers, each of size %dGB\n",
>
This only gets triggered when regular init path is chosen, i.e.
--no-huge still works. I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending
to work on FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :) As far
as the patch goes, the problem it addresses does get fixed.
Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
@ 2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 14:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 13:59 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-02 14:42 ` [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2021-09-13 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burakov, Anatoly; +Cc: dev, david.marchand, stable
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 02:14:55PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 13-Sep-21 12:06 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
> > mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
> > using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
> > issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
> > processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
> >
> > Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> > index 408f054f7a..4a8d87c23e 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
> > @@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void)
> > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not open "CONTIGMEM_DEV"\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > + if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX) < 0) {
> > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not lock memory. Is another DPDK process running?\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > if (buffer_size >= 1<<30)
> > RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Contigmem driver has %d buffers, each of size %dGB\n",
> >
>
> This only gets triggered when regular init path is chosen, i.e. --no-huge
> still works.
Yes, but that is ok, I think, since no-huge doesn't use these resources or
suffer from this problem. On the other hand, except for running unit tests,
no-huge mode is pretty useless on FreeBSD as we don't have any
vfio-equivalent support, so all HW access has to use physical addresses
which can only be got using contigmem.
> I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending to work on
> FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :)
Yes, it is, though one that does belong is the same area as this one. The
"fix" is probably to just print a warning when --in-memory is used,
informing the user that the flag is ignored and then continue.
Alternatively we can error out, but I think the warn+continue is better,
myself.
> As far as the patch
> goes, the problem it addresses does get fixed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>
Thanks.
/Bruce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-09-13 13:59 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-02 14:42 ` [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk @ 2021-09-13 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burakov, Anatoly; +Cc: Bruce Richardson, dev, david.marchand, stable
2021-09-13 14:14 (UTC+0100), Burakov, Anatoly:
> [...]
> I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending
> to work on FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :)
On Windows, --in-memory does not pretend to work, just the opposite,
it is enabled implicitly as it's the only working mode.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 11:06 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
@ 2021-09-13 14:08 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-10-06 14:56 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2021-09-13 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Bruce Richardson, stable, Anatoly Burakov
Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---
V2: Adding missing LOCK_NB flag to make sure the process doesn't sit
waiting for the lock to be released
lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
index 408f054f7a..9dbe375bd3 100644
--- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
+++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void)
RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not open "CONTIGMEM_DEV"\n");
return -1;
}
+ if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB) < 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not lock memory. Is another DPDK process running?\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
if (buffer_size >= 1<<30)
RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Contigmem driver has %d buffers, each of size %dGB\n",
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-09-13 14:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-10-02 14:43 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Burakov, Anatoly @ 2021-09-13 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev, david.marchand, stable
On 13-Sep-21 2:36 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 02:14:55PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> On 13-Sep-21 12:06 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
>>> mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
>>> using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
>>> issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
>>> processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
>>> index 408f054f7a..4a8d87c23e 100644
>>> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
>>> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_hugepage_info.c
>>> @@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ eal_hugepage_info_init(void)
>>> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not open "CONTIGMEM_DEV"\n");
>>> return -1;
>>> }
>>> + if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX) < 0) {
>>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "could not lock memory. Is another DPDK process running?\n");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> if (buffer_size >= 1<<30)
>>> RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Contigmem driver has %d buffers, each of size %dGB\n",
>>>
>>
>> This only gets triggered when regular init path is chosen, i.e. --no-huge
>> still works.
>
> Yes, but that is ok, I think, since no-huge doesn't use these resources or
> suffer from this problem. On the other hand, except for running unit tests,
> no-huge mode is pretty useless on FreeBSD as we don't have any
> vfio-equivalent support, so all HW access has to use physical addresses
> which can only be got using contigmem.
What i meant to say was, i've checked this against '--no-huge' which
*should* still work with this patch, and it does :) So, the phrasing was
unfortunate, but we agree!
>
>> I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending to work on
>> FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :)
>
> Yes, it is, though one that does belong is the same area as this one. The
> "fix" is probably to just print a warning when --in-memory is used,
> informing the user that the flag is ignored and then continue.
> Alternatively we can error out, but I think the warn+continue is better,
> myself.
I think erroring out is better. The feature is intended to work a
certain way, so if we can't guarantee that it does, we can't pretend it
is "supported" or "is working". But again, irrelevant to this patch :)
>
>> As far as the patch
>> goes, the problem it addresses does get fixed.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>>
> Thanks.
>
> /Bruce
>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 13:59 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
@ 2021-10-02 14:42 ` David Marchand
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2021-10-02 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burakov, Anatoly; +Cc: Bruce Richardson, dev, dpdk stable
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 3:15 PM Burakov, Anatoly
<anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
> On 13-Sep-21 12:06 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
> > mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
> > using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
> > issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
> > processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
> >
> > Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 14:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
@ 2021-10-02 14:43 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2021-10-02 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Burakov, Anatoly; +Cc: Bruce Richardson, dev, dpdk stable
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Burakov, Anatoly
<anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
> >> I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending to work on
> >> FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :)
> >
> > Yes, it is, though one that does belong is the same area as this one. The
> > "fix" is probably to just print a warning when --in-memory is used,
> > informing the user that the flag is ignored and then continue.
> > Alternatively we can error out, but I think the warn+continue is better,
> > myself.
>
> I think erroring out is better. The feature is intended to work a
> certain way, so if we can't guarantee that it does, we can't pretend it
> is "supported" or "is working". But again, irrelevant to this patch :)
>
Please, can you review
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210913140848.184928-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com/
?
Thanks.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts
2021-09-13 14:08 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
@ 2021-10-06 14:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-10-06 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev, stable, Anatoly Burakov
13/09/2021 16:08, Bruce Richardson:
> Only a single DPDK process on the system can be using the /dev/contigmem
> mappings at a time, but this was never explicitly enforced, e.g. when
> using --in-memory flag on two processes. To prevent possible conflict
> issues, we lock the dev node when it's in use, preventing other DPDK
> processes from starting up and causing problems for us.
>
> Fixes: 764bf26873b9 ("add FreeBSD support")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Looks to be applied by David.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-06 14:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-13 11:06 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-13 13:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-13 14:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-10-02 14:43 ` David Marchand
2021-09-13 13:59 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-10-02 14:42 ` [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2021-09-13 14:08 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2021-10-06 14:56 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).