Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

27/03/2019 18:25, Luca Boccassi:
> On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> > along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> > from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> > 
> > Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> > planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> > no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> > I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> > 
> > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
> >  
> >  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> > -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> > +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> > major
> > +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> > designated
> > +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> > release.
> >  
> >  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> > back to an
> 
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Applied, thanks