From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD78A0032 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A03C427F7; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78FA41144 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1663148058; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xPcoCZXHfwzmNcetqs78zKQ8h7+oQId07uLzZnqk1R4=; b=LGIEJ9SEEwnSxJm8r8hdq5h8jPja3IsfVOwAAWdnMtS/6NndsPHn/0cqsXk0L+Nir6Bvqg bS5oSv1yPOiC/VUWU4HgOmgCQcZnTJNGctni6SUGVUPpX4AuhVYZJF2UxKBvP+umz8nxKM uWNqK43lnj2sZGXurmCRDhAdMnkjgo0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-516-p-eIX2FtOrOH77wX1gVBGQ-1; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:34:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: p-eIX2FtOrOH77wX1gVBGQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEEC88027ED; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.26] (unknown [10.39.208.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9302166B26; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4ac23626-27fb-e319-8050-82f504393589@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation To: Thomas Monjalon , "Xia, Chenbo" , David Marchand Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20220722135320.109269-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <8e7d0748-afa9-0ed0-443a-62b2523d7403@redhat.com> <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin: >> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote: >>> From: Maxime Coquelin >>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream. >>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can >>>> perform the backport. >>>> >>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few >>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch >>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews? >>> >>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen >>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this. >> >> OK, sounds good to me. >> >> Thomas/David, is that good on your side? > > Is there a blocker to merge the whole series? No, I reviewed the whole series. But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more reviews. I am fine either way. Thanks, Maxime