From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03126A0A02
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:30:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB714014F;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:30:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DAC4014F;
 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:30:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604DB5C00ED;
 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:30:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh=
 ei4nwQiWtKvSs639r/yhHI/2Zp28JxroA7iTG/Dvyz8=; b=GMhss8mlYFRRnrNs
 c9RE6BltnDIKsESqOin2vH+1eg88V2oP85ZQ7JJmLCPguiIHoGr8OJP7yxN15PlA
 dna+y0aTHNj76w5ctXgpn9btDXTp8ff3MY+oCWiBP3T6zt3DMLqVxLYzLHNAbCya
 ArwexssnQCD+HRnSK3GFLes20ITsY6uzGqSX2IZCZoY7/jZKqg4IXs1DpW9c19K8
 jz80E/8BO3qcxVD9WTHfKpQqbixE1pyUM8wuOOji2XwXapOjujImUXp/+TnzoCBV
 1+6G83Lwh5uCeqWbTH1ILswrHVvtCMixhPaH0dRV9+tLZP5iQPysbrO3G6CEsrxu
 1R+SQg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ei4nwQiWtKvSs639r/yhHI/2Zp28JxroA7iTG/Dvy
 z8=; b=lKUxRHJ7Tv4BRUwAjWfQCszbAgInt4is0ulcnfa2LfhtBoNPpodzCkzWK
 ivsM/kSWCsWoaTI4U/2LRjiLHYPgxFpgpGeBzODZSv+CVb65XplqxIxHSI1E77M/
 +GvDFLjYK+3GKMYd8ovCgatFY6STV6fK8khzbgba6ogSCNuy/6iL8G5Ib+rS0I+6
 K/azRccBA4a2jyTNCtGG2RFx1zbVoL4oAx45tQpG2LQfgZavGw1nG+Cpl8jOSbge
 aTYZrLfYklt441vNftjJVkxM2lxE5o5ztivJSC0XJPnVXL3tgsQEnScy1x50T2Ll
 uhPDFLf4iQtk2VDosG7tRdc5HJRbw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:a69bYLG0255lKgJhCNbFmmUxMBUBY0d5_GSBdhw9sxpBQljrSL84AQ>
 <xme:a69bYJ2R8NvqSBZtsIXhP9EFZIzA9fEl8Crqij9sAY4yvjkyqaRf9SanI3h__LShL
 irCQ_ib4ubbXxrNjQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudegkedgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh
 necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd
 enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm
 rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc
 ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh
 teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge
 drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl
 fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:a69bYKzmok02oLlQR1jaeaKN-D8I04p4Jz2iy0jLdT-6LUQ5HOausw>
 <xmx:a69bYAhy6kTO7ufQe-aS5gBpQh3ri-ctQJV0C2ndRaq6L-Y1RbK30A>
 <xmx:a69bYBxZzqYomlP9Oqrp9vMazwuMwjqY0Rz7p9DS_ZyJl7mzzSMFeg>
 <xmx:bK9bYL0lsbt4QPjs9iSVhfelx64W1wHqrIbkDmWvF4BFx0JyJakmUA>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9B547108005C;
 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:30:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Pu Xu <583493798@qq.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "cuanduo@126.com" <cuanduo@126.com>, "Burakov,
 Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:30:17 +0100
Message-ID: <5140426.dOB98B4sCM@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <27420753.GspcrUYuLZ@thomas>
References: <20200501161107.33786-1-583493798@qq.com>
 <BYAPR11MB3301E90D5EFED182E6BFD16A9AAB0@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <27420753.GspcrUYuLZ@thomas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ip_frag: fix fragmenting ipv4
 packet with header	option
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

24/05/2020 17:27, Thomas Monjalon:
> 01/05/2020 22:43, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 
> > > 
> > > When fragmenting ipv4 packet, the data offset should be calculated through
> > > the ihl field in ip header rather than using sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr).
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4c38e5532a07 ("ip_frag: refactor IPv4 fragmentation into a proper library")
> > > Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > ---
> > 
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> 
> The patch cannot be merged because it is missing a Signed-off-by line.
> 
> In general, please follow the contributions guideline here:
> 	http://core.dpdk.org/contribute/#send
> 
> Would be appreciated to number subsequent versions of the patches,
> and use --in-reply-to to keep them threaded.

Are we going to celebrate one year birthday of this patch? :)
How can we proceed?