patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Scott Wasson <scott_wasson@affirmednetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, iryzhov@nfware.com,
	Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] kni: fix bug 389 - Crash in librte_kni driver due to noncontiguous pages
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:28:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570fb7fd-6cac-ec87-66a1-d82b82fa62f6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581364020-4315-1-git-send-email-scott_wasson@affirmednetworks.com>

On 2/10/2020 7:47 PM, Scott Wasson wrote:
> Fixes: edd2fafbc0b8 ("kni: allocate memory dynamically for each device")
> Cc: iryzhov@nfware.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

I suggest following patch subject:
"kni: fix not contiguous FIFO"

And I little detail in the comment log can be good:
"
KNI requires FIFO to be physically contiguous, with existing
'rte_memzone_reserve()' API this is not guaranteed by default and as a result
KNI rings and packet delivery is broken.

Fixing it by providing 'RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG' flag to ask physically
contiguous memory.
"

And the Fixes tag should show the commit that updates the
'rte_memzone_reserve()' API to not provide physically contiguous memory.
@Anatoly, can you help finding that commit?


> 
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wasson <scott_wasson@affirmednetworks.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c |   14 +++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> index e388751..df4a021 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
> @@ -145,31 +145,31 @@ enum kni_ops_status {
>  	char mz_name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE];
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_TX_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_tx_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_tx_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);

Can you please break the line, so it doesn't go beyond 80 chars?

>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_tx_q == NULL, tx_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_RX_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_rx_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_rx_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_rx_q == NULL, rx_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_ALLOC_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_alloc_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_alloc_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_alloc_q == NULL, alloc_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_FREE_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_free_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_free_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_free_q == NULL, free_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_REQ_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_req_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_req_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_req_q == NULL, req_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_RESP_Q_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_resp_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_resp_q = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_resp_q == NULL, resp_q_fail);
>  
>  	snprintf(mz_name, RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE, KNI_SYNC_ADDR_MZ_NAME_FMT, kni->name);
> -	kni->m_sync_addr = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> +	kni->m_sync_addr = rte_memzone_reserve(mz_name, KNI_FIFO_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_IOVA_CONTIG);
>  	KNI_MEM_CHECK(kni->m_sync_addr == NULL, sync_addr_fail);
>  
>  	return 0;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 19:47 Scott Wasson
2020-02-11  9:28 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-02-11 12:18   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-02-11 14:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-14 10:00 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] kni: fix not contiguous FIFO Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-14 11:30   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570fb7fd-6cac-ec87-66a1-d82b82fa62f6@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
    --cc=scott_wasson@affirmednetworks.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).