From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C45A0524 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 17:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4402F4003F; Mon, 31 May 2021 17:01:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097C04003F for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 17:01:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AEA5C01A1; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:01:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 31 May 2021 11:01:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= OXyhtUIqnFXr8+QroJvCuRWgYaj82kaaGjl686ts6x4=; b=vCBaOR7mjbVHXFhY sNNxnIxGX6lmQBeS0u3KgmUw8sbfmJ53at8u/sGAH/yIC2dRVYFQGdLi6bBRskHR lrkJIbkPWxlQGmZ4bpMsrWnblwEP+6+TOYksJuOOXugRPRJOR28eudW6dw57Rsgd 6Uv9yFaK56v7UcuYONg/KE3yKtiry22rshASlthW/ok/JxTV3iacmCbqrIhlABn0 UFjkvHpI9hFfOnjuJl1cZF6ASQZb0JpvYxN2AOxBtLBJKgLOCkU5jWpaBxCnnkrD NZwfaZodGzpRhDK1p2+XAtSKv72z2hUmMozW19FSwAsttFtFcv6QLcdVlPOEzbqd VqFKRg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OXyhtUIqnFXr8+QroJvCuRWgYaj82kaaGjl686ts6 x4=; b=KXRmagkQvxUsujdjXwm020w2CtuR/xkKqsepGfWLO6rUIXb3QpTNBDNcH AhvtesD/PYLgErObThXP7otAth//33onBq0K5SfQ1iFMjNLzYIGF32jYhUoKREWh YYcvingrEdSNvOFP2ZILHueFOVn8Kt6XctEznbQNUQ4Q/SMTuDB54pMoeh3jYoC/ sHGzks4yyoxl3RSecleNvAIpjSxVD9mn4ggPb+GruZLcwNKdpV5w8Y0BCuN+tesd WUXS2pZO6lIG3xpTQhD/ADFwXlZQJJ+JsqXZLQRaSHMF4w1x+ac7pvKDofVtuh5y 5u08ZMeNKRDkND7i4w0dkL37uPBfQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelfedgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfevhedtheejvdegvdegffeljeehueeftdeihefffeelhfeivdeg teffueekfefgnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhm rghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 31 May 2021 11:01:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Yu, DapengX" , Christian Ehrhardt Cc: "Yu, PingX" , dpdk stable Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 17:01:15 +0200 Message-ID: <6340038.7RWX4JVtyS@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] It there plan to queue this patch to stable release 19.11.9 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 31/05/2021 11:21, Christian Ehrhardt: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:13 AM Yu, DapengX wrote: > > This patch: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-March/029204.html > > This patch actually was never merged in the main branch > On main we have: > > commit f93949c3afc39b0f610e0661f7baa21060ada13a > Author: Haiyue Wang > net/ice: fix memory leak on dev closed > > This one also refers to bd513ece3c40 for a fix and was in 19.11 already. > Then quite similar to what you referred to, but a more generic (all > drivers) fix on the main branch > > commit 30410493759f4bae3f65497737661e27b93c2d0e > Author: Thomas Monjalon > drivers/net: check process type in close operation > See => https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/30410493759f4bae3f65497737661e27b93c2d0e > > This one was in 20.11 but not targeted for stable@dpdk.org > > The patch almost applies but since the change is mostly the same to > all drivers it seems backportable. > > Maybe if you could sync with Thomas if this (general) solution is > applicable and prepare the backport we can add it. > It is close as I wanted to call for RC1 already, but if done soon it > should be fine. > I'll hold back 19.11.9-RC1 another day to give this a chance to be > clarified until tomorrow. > > @Dapeng please talk to Thomas and consider providing a 19.11.9 > backport of the fix that made it into the main branch. > @Thomas Monjalon was there a specific reason/prereq which made you not > targeting stable@ with the fix? It was not considered as a fix but a behaviour improvement :) I agree it could be backported.