From: Nick Connolly <nick.connolly@mayadata.io>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] mem: fix allocation failure on non-NUMA kernel
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:21:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64e06514-67ef-9843-48f1-beed83b03991@mayadata.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e79e24fd-9028-1ba3-aa36-9c51cfe95ce3@6wind.com>
On 05/08/2020 16:13, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 05/08/2020 à 16:53, Nick Connolly a écrit :
> [snip]
>>>>>> + if (check_numa()) {
>>>>>> + ret = get_mempolicy(&cur_socket_id, NULL, 0, addr,
>>>>>> + MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "%s(): get_mempolicy: %s\n",
>>>>>> + __func__, strerror(errno));
>>>>>> + goto mapped;
>>>>>> + } else if (cur_socket_id != socket_id) {
>>>>>> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL,
>>>>>> + "%s(): allocation happened on wrong socket (wanted %d,
>>>>>> got %d)\n",
>>>>>> + __func__, socket_id, cur_socket_id);
>>>>>> + goto mapped;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>> + if (rte_socket_count() > 1)
>>>>>> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "%s(): not checking socket for allocation
>>>>>> (wanted %d)\n",
>>>>>> + __func__, socket_id);
>>>>> nit: maybe an higher log level like WARNING?
>>>> Open to guidance here - my concern was that this is going to be generated for
>>>> every call to alloc_seg() and I'm not sure what the frequency will be - I'm
>>>> cautious about flooding the log with warnings under 'normal running'. Are the
>>>> implications of running on a multi socket system with NUMA support disabled in
>>>> the kernel purely performance related for the DPDK or is there a functional
>>>> correctness issue as well?
>>> Is it really a 'normal running' to have CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES in
>>> dpdk and not CONFIG_NUMA in the kernel?
>> I'm not an expert of DPDK, but I think it needs to be treated as 'normal
>> running', for the following reasons:
>>
>> 1. The existing code in eal_memalloc_alloc_seg_bulk() is designed to
>> work even if check_numa() indicates that NUMA support is not enabled:
>>
>> #ifdef RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES
>> if (check_numa()) {
>> oldmask = numa_allocate_nodemask();
>> prepare_numa(&oldpolicy, oldmask, socket);
>> have_numa = true;
>> }
>> #endif
> The question was not to return an error, but to display a warning. So the code
> will work (after your patch), no problem.
>
>> 2. The DPDK application could be built with
>> CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGE_PAGES and then the binary run on
>> different systems with and without NUMA support.
> In a production environment, it seems odd to have a custom kernel and a generic
> dpdk app, it's why I propose the log level WARNING (or NOTICE maybe?).
> I let other comment about this, I don't have a strong opinion.
Thanks - appreciate the input - I also have no strong opinions here and
am happy to be guided.
Regards,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-05 12:26 Nick Connolly
2020-08-05 13:42 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2020-08-05 14:20 ` Nick Connolly
2020-08-05 14:36 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2020-08-05 14:53 ` Nick Connolly
2020-08-05 15:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2020-08-05 15:21 ` Nick Connolly [this message]
2020-09-17 11:28 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-09-17 11:31 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-09-17 12:29 ` Nick Connolly
2020-09-17 12:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-09-17 13:05 ` Nick Connolly
2020-09-17 14:07 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-09-17 14:08 ` Nick Connolly
2020-09-17 14:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-09-17 14:19 ` Nick Connolly
2020-10-12 19:28 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Nick Connolly
2020-10-13 7:59 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2020-10-13 12:01 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64e06514-67ef-9843-48f1-beed83b03991@mayadata.io \
--to=nick.connolly@mayadata.io \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).