From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538415681; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:16:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2018 09:16:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,295,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="68475830" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.148]) ([10.237.220.148]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2018 09:16:30 -0700 To: Qi Zhang , dev@dpdk.org Cc: gage.eads@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org References: <20180827122732.5531-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <7ea4dd19-cd84-7b40-e0b9-ff25b85d6769@intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:16:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180827122732.5531-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] bus/vdev: fix wrong error log on secondary device scan X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:16:33 -0000 On 27-Aug-18 1:27 PM, Qi Zhang wrote: > When a secondary process handles VDEV_SCAN_ONE mp action, it is possible > the device is already be inserted. This happens when we have multiple > secondary processes which cause multiple broadcasts from primary during > bus->scan. So we don't need to log any error for -EEXIST. > > Bugzilla ID: 84 > Fixes: cdb068f031c6 ("bus/vdev: scan by multi-process channel") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Reported-by: Eads Gage > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang > --- > drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > index 6139dd551..af9526fe6 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c > @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ vdev_action(const struct rte_mp_msg *mp_msg, const void *peer) > const struct vdev_param *in = (const struct vdev_param *)mp_msg->param; > const char *devname; > int num; > + int ret; > > strlcpy(mp_resp.name, VDEV_MP_KEY, sizeof(mp_resp.name)); > mp_resp.len_param = sizeof(*ou); > @@ -380,7 +381,10 @@ vdev_action(const struct rte_mp_msg *mp_msg, const void *peer) > break; > case VDEV_SCAN_ONE: > VDEV_LOG(INFO, "receive vdev, %s", in->name); > - if (insert_vdev(in->name, NULL, NULL) < 0) > + ret = insert_vdev(in->name, NULL, NULL); > + if (ret == -EEXIST) > + VDEV_LOG(INFO, "device already exist, %s", in->name); This is probably going to be printed a lot, and there's no real point in that. Maybe set log level to DEBUG instead? > + else if (ret < 0) > VDEV_LOG(ERR, "failed to add vdev, %s", in->name); > break; > default: > -- Thanks, Anatoly