From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18.11] malloc: fix deadlock when using malloc stats
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 13:09:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8322983.QTS3aZyW4V@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884a355bde19652d57c253c6b36036571c4f46ee.1543926108.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
04/12/2018 13:22, Anatoly Burakov:
> Currently, malloc statistics and external heap creation code
> use memory hotplug lock as a way to synchronize accesses to
> heaps (as in, locking the hotplug lock to prevent list of heaps
> from changing under our feet). At the same time, malloc
> statistics code will also lock the heap because it needs to
> access heap data and does not want any other thread to allocate
> anything from that heap.
>
> In such scheme, it is possible to enter a deadlock with the
> following sequence of events:
>
> thread 1 thread 2
> rte_malloc()
> rte_malloc_dump_stats()
> take heap lock
> take hotplug lock
> failed to allocate,
> attempt to take
> hotplug lock
> attempt to take heap lock
>
> Neither thread will be able to continue, as both of them are
> waiting for the other one to drop the lock. Adding an
> additional lock will require an ABI change, so instead of
> that, make malloc statistics calls thread-unsafe with
> respect to creating/destroying heaps.
>
> Fixes: 72cf92b31855 ("malloc: index heaps using heap ID rather than NUMA node")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> IMO this is the best we can do for 18.11 without breaking ABI.
> For 19.02, we can introduce a new global heap lock (something
> i should've done in the first place...), so this patch is
> not applicable to 19.02. For 19.02, we can fix this properly
> by introducing another lock and breaking the EAL ABI.
>
> Not sure where to put docs update, feedback welcome.
This patch is also changing the API, because functions become not thread-safe.
I think you should note it in the release notes.
About 19.02, do we want to take this patch (with release notes updated)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-21 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 12:22 [dpdk-stable] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-21 12:09 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-12-21 12:12 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-21 12:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 19.02 v2] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-21 13:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8322983.QTS3aZyW4V@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).