From: Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com>
To: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Rong, Leyi" <leyi.rong@intel.com>,
"Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] net/ixgbe: adjust error for UDP with zero checksum
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:42:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8h29xit.fsf@fed.void> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR11MB379526A102AB5969E87E2651F7B59@BN8PR11MB3795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wang, Haiyue
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 20:57
>> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; pvalerio@redhat.com; Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Tu, Lijuan <Lijuan.Tu@intel.com>; dpdk
>> stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
>> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
>> Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] net/ixgbe: adjust error for UDP with zero checksum
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 20:54
>> > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
>> > Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; pvalerio@redhat.com; Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> > <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; dpdk
>> > stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
>> > Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
>> > Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/ixgbe: adjust error for UDP with zero checksum
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com> wrote:
>> > > > If the driver/hw can't report a valid checksum hint, it should
>> > > > announce it does not know if the checksum is valid (neither bad, nor
>> > > > good).
>> > > >
>> > > > So the workaround for udp packets (on this hw model) would be to
>> > > > report PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN.
>> > > > The sw application will then have to recompute the checksum itself if needed.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Make sense, but not sure the vector path can handle this more easily. Will try.
>> >
>> > Refining this a bit.
>> > It looks like hw correctly reports "good" checksums, so maybe instead
>> > report PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN only for reports of "bad" checksums
>> > from the hw?
>>
>> I guess Paolo will complain about the performance drop for zero checksum
>> UDP. ;-)
>>
:)
>
> Deep into OVS for detail, 'PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN' is a graceful way. ;-)
> Will work for this target.
yes, validation gets skipped in such case.
I'll be happy to test it once posted.
>
> /* Validation must be skipped if checksum is 0 on IPv4 packets */
> return (udp->udp_csum == 0 && key->dl_type == htons(ETH_TYPE_IP))
> || (validate_checksum ? checksum_valid(key, data, size, l3) : true);
>
>> >
>> > --
>> > David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 7:06 Haiyue Wang
2021-02-02 9:45 ` David Marchand
2021-02-02 12:42 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-02-02 12:53 ` David Marchand
2021-02-02 12:56 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-02-02 14:28 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-02-02 17:42 ` Paolo Valerio [this message]
2021-02-02 12:54 ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-02-03 2:19 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix UDP zero checksum error Haiyue Wang
2021-02-03 8:07 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-02-03 8:32 ` David Marchand
2021-02-04 7:45 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-02-04 14:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Haiyue Wang
2021-02-05 17:50 ` Paolo Valerio
2021-02-07 18:40 ` Paolo Valerio
2021-02-08 13:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-02-09 1:23 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-02-25 10:54 ` David Marchand
2021-04-07 11:53 ` David Marchand
2021-04-08 1:12 ` Wang, Haiyue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8h29xit.fsf@fed.void \
--to=pvalerio@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \
--cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).