patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	<stable@dpdk.org>, "Anatoly Burakov" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Kozlyuk" <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
	"Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile" <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Dmitry Malloy" <dmitrym@microsoft.com>,
	"Pallavi Kadam" <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Andrew Rybchenko" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] eal/unix: allow creating thread with real-time priority
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 19:54:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9EF8B@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23265462.6Emhk5qWAg@thomas>

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2023 18.46
> 
> 25/10/2023 17:37, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:13:14 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > >  	case RTE_THREAD_PRIORITY_REALTIME_CRITICAL:
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * WARNING: Real-time busy loop takes priority on kernel
> threads,
> > > +		 *          making the system unstable.
> > > +		 *          There is also a known issue when using
> rte_ring.
> > > +		 */
> >
> > I was thinking something like:
> >
> > 	static bool warned;
> > 	if (!warned) {
> > 		RTE_LOG(NOTICE, EAL, "Real time priority is unstable when
> thread is polling without sleep\n");
> > 		warned = true;
> > 	}
> 
> I'm not sure about bothering users.
> They can fear something is wrong even if the developer took care of it.
> I think doc warnings for developers are more appropriate.
> I've added notes in the API.

I agree with Thomas on this.

If you want the log message, please degrade it to INFO or DEBUG level. It is only relevant when chasing problems, not for normal production - and thus NOTICE is too high.


Someone might build a kernel with options to keep non-dataplane threads off some dedicated CPU cores, so they can be used for guaranteed low-latency dataplane threads. We do. We don't use real-time priority, though.

For reference, we did some experiments (using this custom built kernel) with a dedicated thread doing nothing but a loop calling rte_rdtsc_precise() and registering the delta. Although the overwhelming majority is ca. CPU 80 cycles, there are some big outliers at ca. 9,000 CPU cycles. (Order of magnitude: ca. 45 of these big outliers per minute.) Apparently some kernel threads steal some cycles from this thread, regardless of our customizations. We haven't bothered analyzing and optimizing it further.

I think our experiment supports the need to allow kernel threads to run, e.g. by calling sleep() or similar, when an EAL thread has real-time priority.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-25 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24 12:54 [PATCH] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-24 13:55 ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-24 16:04   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-25 13:15     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 13:34       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-25 13:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 15:08           ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-25 15:14             ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-25 15:18               ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 15:32                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 15:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 15:37   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-25 16:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-25 17:54       ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-10-25 21:33         ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-26  7:33           ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-26 16:32             ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-26 17:07               ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-26  0:00         ` Stephen Hemminger
     [not found] ` <20231025163352.1076755-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
2023-10-25 16:31   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " Thomas Monjalon
     [not found] ` <20231026134313.1165954-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
2023-10-26 13:37   ` [PATCH v4 " Thomas Monjalon
     [not found] ` <20231026142749.1174372-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
2023-10-26 14:19   ` [PATCH v5 " Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-27  8:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-27  8:45   ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-27  9:11     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-10-27 18:15     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-07 19:27   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9EF8B@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitrym@microsoft.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).