From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC30A0547 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DDC1CC533; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C5E4003C; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:25:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149945814B8; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:25:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap22 ([10.202.2.72]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:25:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=u256.net; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=4K8WAnCwGI2bmyX21GpR26P2XwNaQV1 cK5IFFDyBwOo=; b=ejp5llNwpbeCH2rD3kfT1Zp5fVQ3/dK3WRzMM/XCkP8mBAc 1eWzchJL4Q/4UzmADGO089o82HRUq4ZsLnDX0nDG+p6ipSQVwJM4RoFuxWDD86gF D46FJui8D4/UHEGJzliObAB0bs8hihH9exY0k1QS3f9M6VY+Q9fixgdsITwPTeB0 PWAHUS6X1kLmVIdAmV0uXZNZs56LLLp8sSh3JW/dzwq+fcz06eVedCLPuYv6A8Bl mMU6wRA4g1SOQ7jgsUQygGe64LJwkZRjJxvNeYjLsSk58nT6HCxOiIb0bMSjAnso m7VxdZRNqyjeeA/GgNDYjUNEgy35mYAiMlz3uDg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=4K8WAn CwGI2bmyX21GpR26P2XwNaQV1cK5IFFDyBwOo=; b=mPNz8cXMc0MDJZV14gdzDN LvC+vslWzFJjqF6iARmh/7/lfO/+yBsG73MP9MVNnxn/ohiNLd+L+0OaNxGtLS1I sB+bINomuUTLaV+01bjIYFzrZOC7PSupvfkxm8iHBG09qWt4wJ5k/2LKkoGrwnC5 a2kt7yoWx5JAxk349y6NCtZaBvY9MZ/CnJQMmHhOWoy5TFiI3QAODhutyKWlFbly XMLwlZJM0Y/VXGZvORSNOGbrQIveXo6ysgUOQfOmMNTR5lxj9Vo+lT/gb4Qc/1RG htmV/E8GVHCqK5RsXa3UAZbz0CexcV6BzH731VTyjxt3ayzxcIN3wPKr+epl7RKg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeefgdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpefirgotthgr nhgptfhivhgvthcuoehgrhhivhgvsehuvdehiedrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epgfeuhfffleeludeuheeuteeufeegtdeiveduudfhgeevteeutdelueffueehkeefnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrihhvvg esuhdvheeirdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 92CEB62C0064; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:25:45 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <992599a3-a671-47a7-9940-4d622c14e882@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1c67d7dc-a4d9-974f-8bcb-0eb2f7160d89@intel.com> References: <20201222080004.837537-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> <1c67d7dc-a4d9-974f-8bcb-0eb2f7160d89@intel.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:25:22 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ga=C3=ABtan_Rivet?= To: "Ferruh Yigit" , "Andrew Rybchenko" , dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org, "Pavan Nikhilesh" , "Andrew Rybchenko" Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix RSS hash offload reporting X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, at 08:49, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 12/22/2020 8:00 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > If sub-devices support RSS hash offload, the offload should be > > reported by the failsafe device since handling is transparent > > from failsafe point of view. > > > > Fixes: 5d308972954c ("ethdev: add mbuf RSS update as an offload") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko > > It looks reasonable, but would be good to get ack from maintainer. > > Gaetan, can you please look at this? > > Thanks. > Hi Ferruh, Indeed, sorry Andrew about the delay. I agree that this looks reasonable, Acked-by: Gaetan Rivet