From: "Jiang, JunyuX" <junyux.jiang@intel.com>
To: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Han, YingyaX" <yingyax.han@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:45:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e9d954ecf924b4da0d0d72484a5f9e5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0b8b4ff5ce41d6868c5889e5a0c379@intel.com>
HI guojia,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:59 PM
> To: Han, YingyaX <yingyax.han@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX
> <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX
> <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters
>
> Hi, junyu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Han, YingyaX <yingyax.han@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:18 AM
> > To: Jiang, JunyuX <junyux.jiang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX <junyux.jiang@intel.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte
> > counters
> >
> > Tested-by: Yingya Han <yingyax.han@intel.com>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: stable <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Junyu Jiang
> > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 9:54 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Jiang, JunyuX <junyux.jiang@intel.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters
> >
> > This patch fixed the issue that rx/tx bytes overflowed on 48 bit
> > limitation by enlarging the limitation.
> >
> > Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Junyu Jiang <junyux.jiang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 47
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 9 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 11c02b188..e3d4b7f4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -3070,6 +3070,13 @@ i40e_update_vsi_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> > i40e_stat_update_48(hw, I40E_GLV_BPRCH(idx), I40E_GLV_BPRCL(idx),
> > vsi->offset_loaded, &oes->rx_broadcast,
> > &nes->rx_broadcast);
> > +/* enlarge the limitation when rx_bytes overflowed */ if
> > +(vsi->offset_loaded) { if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(vsi->old_rx_bytes) >
> > +nes->rx_bytes)
> > +nes->rx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH; rx_bytes +=
> > +nes->I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(vsi->old_rx_bytes);
> > +}
> > +vsi->old_rx_bytes = nes->rx_bytes;
> > /* exclude CRC bytes */
> > nes->rx_bytes -= (nes->rx_unicast + nes->rx_multicast +
> > nes->rx_broadcast) * RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN; @@ -3096,6 +3103,13 @@
> > i40e_update_vsi_stats(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> > /* GLV_TDPC not supported */
> > i40e_stat_update_32(hw, I40E_GLV_TEPC(idx), vsi->offset_loaded,
> > &oes->tx_errors, &nes->tx_errors);
> > +/* enlarge the limitation when tx_bytes overflowed */ if
> > +(vsi->offset_loaded) { if (I40E_RXTX_BYTES_LOW(vsi->old_tx_bytes) >
> > +nes->tx_bytes)
> > +nes->tx_bytes += (uint64_t)1 << I40E_48_BIT_WIDTH; tx_bytes +=
> > +nes->I40E_RXTX_BYTES_HIGH(vsi->old_tx_bytes);
> > +}
> > +vsi->old_rx_bytes = nes->rx_bytes;
>
> It should be tx, right?
>
You are right, it will be fixed in V2.
> > vsi->offset_loaded = true;
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 1:54 Junyu Jiang
2020-09-10 2:18 ` Han, YingyaX
2020-09-10 5:58 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-10 6:45 ` Jiang, JunyuX [this message]
2020-09-16 1:51 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-16 2:39 ` Han, YingyaX
2020-09-16 5:21 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-16 5:50 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-16 12:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-18 3:44 ` Jiang, JunyuX
2020-09-18 9:23 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Igor Ryzhov
2020-09-18 13:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-21 1:55 ` Jiang, JunyuX
2020-09-18 13:37 ` [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-21 9:59 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-21 11:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-22 7:37 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-22 9:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-22 9:19 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Junyu Jiang
2020-09-22 12:59 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e9d954ecf924b4da0d0d72484a5f9e5@intel.com \
--to=junyux.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yingyax.han@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).