RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] doc: give specific instructions for running as non-root

[Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>]

> From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 11:38 AM
> [...]
> > > > +For ``virtio`` PMD in legacy mode, ``SYS_RAWIO`` capability is
> > > required
> > > > +for ``iopl()`` call to enable access to PCI IO ports.
> > > >
> > >
> > > How "legacy" is legacy-mode? Is it still likely in widespread use
> that
> > > we need this?
> >
> > I don't really know.
> > The spec says that legacy support is optional
> > (2.2.3 Legacy Interface: A Note on Feature Bits) and it aims
> > to reduce the chance of a legacy driver attempting to drive the
> device
> > (4.1.2.1 Device Requirements: PCI Device Discovery).
> > OTOH, DPDK supports it and requirements must be documented.
> > I can add a line suggesting to use modern virtio,
> > but also don't mind removing this.
> >
> 
> I suppose the main question for this legacy virtio bit
> is where it should be documented, more than if it should be.
> Given this is a GSG, we should try and avoid getting too deep
> into driver-specific issues, so I think we should omit legacy virtio here,
> but have it docuemented in the relevant virtio-specific doc.
> Does that seem reasonable?

Yes, moved to the virtio doc (it looks like it could use an update BTW).

I also chose to keep HPET line because there's an entire section on HPET
below in the document.