From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/9] baseband/acc: protection for TB negative scenario
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:28:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4451B9246D8EDF577C489BC6F8DE9@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3eddc59a-7907-f485-d67c-7ae756a0aa31@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
Thanks, will do in v2.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 12:17 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] baseband/acc: protection for TB negative scenario
>
>
>
> On 2/9/23 23:19, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Adding handling of negative scenario for malformed Transport Block
> > mode operations.
> >
> > Fixes: bec597b78a0 ("baseband/acc200: add LTE processing")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > index 34e42d1f6e..797330a5dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
> > @@ -1820,6 +1820,9 @@ enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q,
> struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
> > r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;
> >
> > while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
> > + if (unlikely((input == NULL) || (output == NULL)))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset;
> > /* Set up DMA descriptor */
> > desc = acc_desc(q, total_enqueued_cbs); @@ -1854,6
> +1857,10 @@
> > enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op
> *op,
> > r++;
> > }
> >
> > + /* In case the number of CB doesn't match, the configuration was
> invalid. */
> > + if (current_enqueued_cbs != cbs_in_tb)
>
> Maybe wrap it with unlikely()?
>
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > /* Set SDone on last CB descriptor for TB mode. */
> > desc->req.sdone_enable = 1;
> >
> > @@ -2100,6 +2107,9 @@ vrb_enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_tb(struct
> acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
> > }
> >
> > while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
> > + if (unlikely((input == NULL) || (h_output == NULL)))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_DEC_SCATTER_GATHER))
> > seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) -
> in_offset;
> > else
> > @@ -2145,6 +2155,10 @@ vrb_enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_tb(struct
> acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
> > r++;
> > }
> >
> > + /* In case the number of CB doesn't match, the configuration was
> invalid. */
> > + if (current_enqueued_cbs != cbs_in_tb)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
> > if (check_mbuf_total_left(mbuf_total_left) != 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -2187,6 +2201,8 @@ enqueue_dec_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q,
> struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
> > r = op->turbo_dec.tb_params.r;
> >
> > while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
> > + if (unlikely((input == NULL) || (h_output == NULL)))
> > + return -1;
> >
> > seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset;
> >
> > @@ -2237,6 +2253,10 @@ enqueue_dec_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q,
> struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
> > r++;
> > }
> >
> > + /* In case the number of CB doesn't match, the configuration was
> invalid. */
> > + if (current_enqueued_cbs != cbs_in_tb)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > /* Set SDone on last CB descriptor for TB mode */
> > desc->req.sdone_enable = 1;
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230209221929.265059-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
2023-02-09 22:19 ` Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 8:17 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 17:28 ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] baseband/acc: VRB PMD fixes Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] baseband/acc: protection for TB negative scenario Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-23 8:56 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-23 17:25 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] baseband/acc: remove interrupt support on VRB1 Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] baseband/acc: add explicit mbuf append for soft output Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-22 11:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] baseband/acc: prevent to dequeue more than requested Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] baseband/acc: fix iteration counter in TB mode Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] baseband/acc: fix potential arithmetic overflow Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] baseband/acc: add support for 4GUL CRC drop in VRB PMD Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] baseband/acc: add support for 4GUL with SO and TB Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] baseband/acc: remove printf from PMD function Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-23 9:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] baseband/acc: VRB PMD fixes Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] baseband/acc: add support for 4GUL with SO and TB Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 8:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 17:29 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] baseband/acc: remove interrupt support on VRB1 Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 8:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] baseband/acc: add explicit mbuf apend for soft output Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 8:40 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-10 17:35 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] baseband/acc: prevent to dequeue more than requested Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 9:39 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] baseband/acc: fix iteration counter in TB mode Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 9:40 ` Maxime Coquelin
2023-02-09 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] baseband/acc: fix potential arithmetic overflow Fix potential issue of overflow causing coverity warning Nicolas Chautru
2023-02-10 9:41 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB4451B9246D8EDF577C489BC6F8DE9@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).