RE: [PATCH v1 1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure

["Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>]

Hi Maxime, 
Yes this new commit fixes the last commit on the tree. You might want to merge these 2 commits into one or not. 
I mentioned this in the cover letter I believe.
Thanks
Nic

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 6, 2023 6:51 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure
> 
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 12/15/22 00:33, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Adding check for error on return of the rte_bbdev_*_op_alloc_bulk
> > calls in bbdev-test.
> >
> > Fixes: f714a18885a6 ("app/testbbdev: add test application for
> > bbdev")
> 
> Above line should not be breaked, can be fixed while applying if no other
> comments on the series.
> 
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 6 +++---
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index a922d69ada..b2096525ea 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -4959,7 +4959,7 @@ offload_latency_test_fft(struct rte_mempool
> *mempool, struct test_buffers *bufs,
> >   			burst_sz = num_to_process - dequeued;
> >
> >   		ret = rte_bbdev_fft_op_alloc_bulk(mempool, ops_enq,
> burst_sz);
> > -		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> ops_enq);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> burst_sz);
> >   		if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE)
> >   			copy_reference_fft_op(ops_enq, burst_sz,
> dequeued,
> >   					bufs->inputs,
> > @@ -5042,7 +5042,7 @@ offload_latency_test_dec(struct rte_mempool
> *mempool, struct test_buffers *bufs,
> >   			burst_sz = num_to_process - dequeued;
> >
> >   		ret = rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk(mempool, ops_enq,
> burst_sz);
> > -		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> ops_enq);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> burst_sz);
> >   		if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE)
> >   			copy_reference_dec_op(ops_enq, burst_sz,
> dequeued,
> >   					bufs->inputs,
> > @@ -5128,7 +5128,7 @@ offload_latency_test_ldpc_dec(struct
> rte_mempool *mempool,
> >   			burst_sz = num_to_process - dequeued;
> >
> >   		ret = rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk(mempool, ops_enq,
> burst_sz);
> > -		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> ops_enq);
> > +		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Allocation failed for %d ops",
> burst_sz);
> >   		if (test_vector.op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE)
> >   			copy_reference_ldpc_dec_op(ops_enq, burst_sz,
> dequeued,
> >   					bufs->inputs,
> 
> The title and commit message does not seem to relate to the content of the
> patch. Is it actually fixing the patch I already merged?
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime