patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiang, YuX" <yux.jiang@intel.com>
To: "christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com"
	<christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>,
	Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
	"Walker,  Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
	David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com"
	<hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>,
	Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Stokes, Ian" <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Ju-Hyoung Lee" <juhlee@microsoft.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"Luca Boccassi" <bluca@debian.org>,
	Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
	"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Peng, Yuan" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
	"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 19.11.12 patches review and test
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:04:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB2711A952D92FE5F37D2F0E2EFE1F9@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321115516.3986382-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 7:55 PM
> To: stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com; Hemant
> Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>;
> Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>;
> Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>;
> Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>;
> Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>; Chen,
> Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> Subject: 19.11.12 patches review and test
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.12.
> 
> The planned date for the final release is 7th of April.
> 
> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and
> reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> 
> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> 
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.12-rc1
> 
> These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> 
Update the test status for Intel part. DPDK19.11.12-rc1 test rate is 60%, totally find four defects as below:
Bug1:[dpdk-19.11.12] metering_and_policing/ipv4_HASH_table_RFC2698: unable to forward packets normally. Intel Dev is investigating.
Bug2:[LTS DPDK-19.11.12-rc1] cryptodev_qat_asym_autotest is failing. Intel Dev is investigating.
Bug3:https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=978 [dpdk-19.11.12-rc1] drivers/net/qede make build failed on Fedora35 with Clang13.0.0.
> Bad commit from Vanshika Shukla <vanshika.shukla@nxp.com>, no fix yet.
Bug4:https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977 [dpdk-19.11.12-rc1] bnxt_stats meson&&make build Error on Fedora35-64 and Ubuntu2110-64 with gcc11.2.1&&gcc11.2.0.
> Has fix (https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/f17a5eb33a2fec2f33476743f56d1fb2d37ca3b7.patch) and verify passed.

# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora35, RHEL8.4, etc.
- All test done. Two new bugs are found, and one known bug(https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747)
* PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. 
- Execution rate is 30%, no new issue is found. 
* VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.		
- Execution rate is 30%, no new issue is found.	
* PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx, etc.
- All test done. No new issue is found. 
* Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single core performance test etc.
- All test done. No big performance drop.
* IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
- On going.			
# Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
* Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing, etc.
- All test done. No new issue is found.
* Cryptodev: 
* Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/ etc.
- On going.
* Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
- On going.

BRs
Yu Jiang

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-21 11:55 christian.ehrhardt
2022-03-30 11:04 ` Jiang, YuX [this message]
2022-03-31 10:00   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-06  6:49     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-06  7:05       ` Jiang, YuX
2022-04-06  8:40         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-03-31 10:50 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-01 14:34 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2022-04-04  6:35   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-04  6:39 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-04  7:02   ` Ali Alnubani
2022-04-04  6:52 ` Ali Alnubani
2022-04-04  7:12   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2022-04-06  2:11 ` Pei Zhang
2022-04-06  6:45   ` Christian Ehrhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB2711A952D92FE5F37D2F0E2EFE1F9@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yux.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=juhlee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).