From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb0-f175.google.com (mail-yb0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F419C6936 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:27:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 191so35219857ybv.3 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 01:27:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JDH6nqJ84rUBSeLy9h1ypEmLDbhR12tkMys1gY+nYfo=; b=2GxGVuMxmlU9mvLOltjrWItXy+59/g3YvTecIxNflTp9wFqzCi9OkTo3WiWq7D58+9 d5l77XGHcuRlfEHUhTFIFOnuZWzJTd+EtvZZcvivelT3/YPbNnwp4Id9qhnDYWbe54/c gPx3CTTVK0gM22A/F2gntm1AbSff4I05aoFRC07froQTcbVgPO7c9pFlAEEu+0LUlyzX qlbQ19QfiVzouJy2RNbentrMBs6MX7P2VyxEbPdEvef5LGoYVDlQ4l1uAOQvHLlH5825 Nd1/xesmXqvGxwZgZ53tLK4AamGHfXea4a/fZPs7kZjlK32oZjRe7kglKvzp+vVtooxM jcWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JDH6nqJ84rUBSeLy9h1ypEmLDbhR12tkMys1gY+nYfo=; b=MDf1RAv2EMgmxboTUr9hHbT1jV19I2EGspgUd8lEmajcoOIpwqIKjd4x96/k1KtjS+ rDWfWe2y7+55rae0dyTmeDjg4Iuch1rHCyYjys3jqJ9H9zgatdxIBWQDKps3MxpVkgAT IKMKLcPUqskZGNx+CULYirgoJr8HmRHETae4hEXvFgJ2pq3ESDAj1qPTMB1I6NiIHBxw 2sx2/MGalAVmP7EugQU1bIQV76ZGStqnqzOK+Y1BgJuKWyiuO6bCTmNxZcGncakbUXxt FzUNJHAAoUQOnafXYAsWUGrgPes2ZNAoWpLuYghGNhYIJcT5E+9fe/jVsw31HItRcbaL 2M9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl0d20Ql45QB9RMg+wlxWd2NRm50PJeMIcBDiaQBHAqSXdzD5XAt+2XCeKRIEPocLHxEVsoE51+F7NcURy3 X-Received: by 10.37.163.99 with SMTP id d90mr27327557ybi.55.1476088068403; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 01:27:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.105.194 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 01:27:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20161010075229.GJ10323@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20161010075229.GJ10323@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: Yuanhan Liu Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , "stable@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] Release note for the stable/lts releases X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:27:49 -0000 On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > Hmm, is it an example to show rejected patches only? Or, do you actually > mean we should not apply it to stable branch? If so, I'm just wondering > why haven't you stated that while I sent out for comments before. > No objection to the patch implied - as you assumed this was only meant to be an example. > > > Also I'd pretty much like to get a commit id of the original patch in > that > > list, so > > * kni: fix crash when removing interface > > would be > > * [5544a453] kni: fix crash when removing interface > > > > What about these suggestions? > > Does that matter? I mean, why we should put it in the release note? > You are right no need in the release notes. > OTOH, I have included the original commit info while cherry-pick it from > upstream. For example, I like how you included the original commit info - that provides what I wanted to see - thanks! -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd