patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
To: "Jiang, YuX" <yux.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	 Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
	"Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
	 David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	 "Govindharajan, Hariprasad" <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>,
	 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"Stokes, Ian" <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
	 Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	 Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
	 "pingx.yu@intel.com" <pingx.yu@intel.com>,
	"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	 Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 "Peng, Yuan" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
	"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 19.11.11 patches review and test
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:47:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAATJJ0+f9zR4+S+43KKghqRc=56FpjNNvcFiX1J4__HX+DvWYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB271183B836D121E34C1249D3FE789@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 8:06 AM Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jiang, YuX
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 7:04 PM
> > To: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com>; christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>;
> > Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> > <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin
> > Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> > <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> > <pezhang@redhat.com>; pingx.yu@intel.com; Xu, Qian Q
> > <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas
> > Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>;
> > Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: 19.11.11 patches review and test
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:14 PM
> > > To: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com; stable@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > > Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>;
> > > Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@intel.com>; David Christensen
> > > <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> > > <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin
> > > Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> > > <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> > > <pezhang@redhat.com>; pingx.yu@intel.com; Xu, Qian Q
> > > <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; Thomas
> > > Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>;
> > > Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > > Subject: RE: 19.11.11 patches review and test
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
> > > > <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 10:43 PM
> > > > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe
> > > <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> > > > Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani
> > > > <alialnu@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@intel.com>;
> > > > David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan,
> > > > Hariprasad <hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > > > <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin
> > > > Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> > > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> > > > <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> > > > <pezhang@redhat.com>; pingx.yu@intel.com; Xu, Qian Q
> > > > <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> > Thomas
> > > > Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan
> > <yuan.peng@intel.com>;
> > > > Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: 19.11.11 patches review and test
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.11.
> > > >
> > > > The planned date for the final release is 7th January 2021.
> > > >
> > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final
> > > > release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release
> > notes.
> > > >
> > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> > > >
> > > >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.11-rc1
> > > >
> > > > These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
> > > >     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > Hi Christian,
> > >
> > > We find many build issues on LTS19.11. But all of them have no fix yet.
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744   DPDK    core    dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] make build failed on Fedora34 with GCC11
> > > and build failed on Fedora35 with gcc11.2.1&clang13.0.0
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747   DPDK    core    dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] Meson build failed with ICC-19.1.1
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900   DPDK    ethdev  dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [19.11.11-rc1] net/nfp build failure with clang 13
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901   DPDK    ethdev  dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [19.11.11-rc1] net/i40e build failure with make and clang 13
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902   DPDK    ethdev  dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [19.11.11-rc1] net/ice build failure with make and clang 13
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903   DPDK    ethdev  dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [19.11.11-rc1] net/ixgbe build failure with make and clang 13
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904   DPDK    meson   dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [dpdk-19.11.11] Meson build has some failures on Fedora35
> > > with clang 13.0.0
> > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   DPDK    meson   dev     UNCO
> > >     ---     [dpdk-19.11.11-rc1]Meson&Makefile build failed on
> > > Freebsd13 with gcc10.3.0&clang11.0.1
> >
> > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk19.11.11-rc1 test is almost
> > finished.
> > Totally find three bugs for Build test from Intel.
> > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> > * Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version
> > and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora34, RHEL8.4, etc.
> > - All test done.
> > - Tree bugs are found.
> >   https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904
> >   https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905
> >   dpdk-19.11.11-rc]KNI build failed used makefile on OpenSuse15.3 with
> > gcc7.5.0&clang11.0.1, has fix.
> > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including
> > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> > - All test done. No new issue is found.
> > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF-
> > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> >
> > - All test done. No new issue is found.
> > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx, etc.
> > - All test done. No new issue is found.
> > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF single
> > core performance test etc.
> > - All test done. No big performance drop.
> > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test -
> > QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> > - All passed.
> > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as
> > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing,
> > etc.
> > - All test done. No new issue is found.
> > * Cryptodev:
> > * Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev
> > ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/ etc.
> > - All test done.
> > * Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance
> > /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
> > - All test done.
> Verify bugs: 901/902/903
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 [19.11.11-rc1] net/i40e build failure with make and clang 13
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 [19.11.11-rc1] net/ice build failure with make and clang 13
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903 [19.11.11-rc1] net/ixgbe build failure with make and clang 13

Thank you, they also work well in all my tests so far.

> Verified patchset https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commits/19.11/
> Commit:
> net/ixgbe: build failure with make and clang 13
> acd0a2d2d net/ice: build failure with make and clang 13
> cc089e955 net/i40e: build failure with make and clang 13
>
> Tested with clang version 13.0.0 (Fedora 13.0.0~rc1-1.fc35) on baseline 19.11.11-rc1,
> No ice/i40e/ixgbe error.
> Find two new bugs:
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911 [19.11.11-rc1] linux/igb_uio/igb_uio build failure with make and clang 13
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 [19.11.11-rc1] net/qede build failure with make and clang 13

Thanks for finding and filing these.
911 is a dup of 907, but 912 seems legit.

-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-09 14:43 christian.ehrhardt
2021-12-13  4:14 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2021-12-13 11:06   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-13 12:39     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-13 12:58       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-13 13:32         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-13 13:49           ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2021-12-13 14:07             ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-14  5:49               ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2021-12-14  7:44                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 10:13                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-14 11:39                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 12:08                       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-14 13:57                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 13:10                       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-14 13:58                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 14:46                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 14:52                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-15 13:17                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-15 14:44                                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-12-16  7:21                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14  7:14 ` Jiang, YuX
2021-12-14  7:45   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14  8:05     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-15 11:04   ` Jiang, YuX
2021-12-15 13:16     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-17  7:05     ` Jiang, YuX
2021-12-17  7:47       ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2021-12-17 14:55         ` Richardson, Bruce
2021-12-17 15:48           ` Richardson, Bruce
2021-12-17 17:57             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2021-12-14 13:51 ` Pei Zhang
2021-12-14 13:52   ` Christian Ehrhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAATJJ0+f9zR4+S+43KKghqRc=56FpjNNvcFiX1J4__HX+DvWYw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=juhlee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=pingx.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=yux.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).