From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE59A034F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:28:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8569540040; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:28:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com [185.125.188.122]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE5D40040 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:28:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C46D3F1E5 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:28:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1638800893; bh=uWQfmejNSbakz3pmPCSmxP4Vnx9u9k66CceiRZoNW1g=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=UrT0kGOMO7HUBAfd5z9iTxF17UjVQfoReWp5gdoZZosZkenXrrQmdQnqwzbtsqIT4 QoFIJsqDaOXka6PsG9YQ2CRU/+JoivWLkS13zutcXdHacOL6n2F0Qh/FBUaQGDS3GF 1SBHqqqRcqlZM+pMw9EEqrrpJIGla40BeUb3FPJD6+VFk5NclcF2poUzC04jYYl1g1 Va/Yh4z6A3Ju2QYeV+WYLmjFK8sVDNwbKB+i86s4BRY3R1Px8+M2zjr1YYgsyYaGNh MdwCsLoQ9huPZM/HoNXNUFPC3d0/9UQ8bH16YKMN0vl6A6IUcUd+aGa9c/wLHb3mKl rNRhdm/OzCQAg== Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b7-20020ac85bc7000000b002b65aee118bso2661371qtb.13 for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 06:28:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uWQfmejNSbakz3pmPCSmxP4Vnx9u9k66CceiRZoNW1g=; b=Cocf5yZN3fNmyQywHzjKDInDYUE0+bzg2a1F+0l3VQt5wIf8EB0oi7H942/AHBjKIt qzCPnRnssDE+bcfBOsxeAeVn80qJW8G19YMX91Xvil0i91e2P9yqZBzy4ePPBO5jPErZ Ni4w7xYlmeYerBABiSC1m4O4LkUFhQvFMPTeoZ7WFywbn6VSA0Ra5d4QaiYKlxjDjPB8 /ke2d6I1e0bhSOm6QW+mA246nOfs25UIcUxH2nEQnv44I3A0RCUCV65HVOtzG32AuuK7 vVW/U7NYr8h90pZn3QpgSP8FC4mMFqTacFunY0XK3LmpDCra7q+y0oxNxWNoeo00h0DJ oXGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533n/8KmRQZqb7Qsk7qitHc097RUPYWVraffFjw2tLgezS+1gDVQ eew1Gn7nCfKVZKYd/RTpVZn9n/+IsWMA38X3RMR9+pgrKXbG3tPv2CA7bn/ng+KCEvGKXM99q5d u29VdJjfUlfOylE3w5YVPBjyeFrmXH+sFrxsHxY2U X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:62b:: with SMTP id a11mr37175113qvx.26.1638800892140; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 06:28:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGl8ey6//G6GoEdBJq+y35VtL2rdlxfCCRfqziiaxFXtyNeDkIH9jFZyo6sXIROW/glALI+60QZ9SpMYD0V4Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:62b:: with SMTP id a11mr37175085qvx.26.1638800891956; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 06:28:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211130165621.2467243-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:27:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: please help backporting some patches to stable release 19.11.11 To: "Ding, Xuan" Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:12 AM Ding, Xuan wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Christian Ehrhardt > >Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 2:27 PM > >To: Ding, Xuan > >Cc: stable@dpdk.org > >Subject: Re: please help backporting some patches to stable release 19.11.11 > > > >On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:07 AM Ding, Xuan wrote: > >> > >> Hi Christian, > >> > >> The two fix patches from mine aimed at DPDK version after 19.11. So they > >only need to be backported in 20.11. > >> 04bcc80204 Xuan Ding net/virtio: fix indirect descriptor reconnection > >> ad6f01945a Xuan Ding net/virtio: fix avail descriptor ID > > > >Thank you, > >they both refer to fix a patch that in turn fixes issues that existed before 19.11. > >Hence they came into the candidate list. > > > >For the second one you are right, this isn't present, but 04bcc80204 refers to > >fix 8c1df884. > >And 8c1df884 is in 19.11.x as: > > > >commit 8c1df8846b15bf87beee2907dd9ecb5d5adaca1d > >Author: Marvin Liu > >Date: Mon Sep 28 16:20:51 2020 +0800 > > > > net/virtio: fix packed ring indirect descricptors setup > > > > [ upstream commit 381f39ebb78a35d8dcc2d4500419644c7de5400f ] > > > > > >So do we really not need/want it? > > Thanks for your confirmation. > For 04bcc80204, I will send out a patch. Thanks in advance > BTW, ad6f01945a refers to b473061b0e1d ("net/virtio: fix indirect descriptors in packed datapaths"). > Why hasn't this patch been backported in 19.11? It was identified way back in time in http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2020-November/026232.html But it didn't apply and no one bothered backporting. Please feel free to provide backports for both b473061b0e1d + ad6f01945a if you want to get them into 19.11.11. > Regards, > Xuan > > > > >> Thanks for your reminder. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Xuan > > > > > >-- > >Christian Ehrhardt > >Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server > >Canonical Ltd -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd