From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFDAA00C5 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:34:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECE04003C; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:34:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com [185.125.188.123]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C4F4003C for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:34:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F7B3FFD5 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:34:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1641292481; bh=/cem7rs/9PN9Tx0MyQwM2poG1c4reyDOEVWqJRRiEyM=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=u2k5EvcKi90xpGHRl3gLAH86iYmjQmscdhaxGaF5oHlYNwNlup2NVKHIsy/sMi+pC HK1VOHFlMqqyn68k0rx+r/e3CP/OncLYZshoQh0cb4TbVFwdHFy3fw3wRvW+qLpr0H gQtPmuxKAwm3reRVgDRQqoL8ZfRSmFtFIzmtizjh1GvW/JRWS5FtMB9V8ftxy9URGS Ebj6JmwA//6EuNku5gnVG+pnCQGOOT3zuGCYW20yThNvkX4dDH8NXvKA9u1Vp7/gAq H/PuOH6QqfddUAbc4GQmYJvC8WHjfx9iCbRYYuk+EHri46p+3AqTF6VQhWC+qIa/h5 OiMACYnded/iA== Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id kc21-20020a056214411500b00411a4b1db94so24830526qvb.19 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 02:34:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/cem7rs/9PN9Tx0MyQwM2poG1c4reyDOEVWqJRRiEyM=; b=OUoSvNoU5HjHhDAi6fdq4UeYGUltTO52MI95dh6VfddthjeuLMi6tqnVs78DThxdV6 j+D9BzAsfKgKiU4BWtS/c2oVPpw2Q0Zf3x6+43ADYzXfBRRTbLKZf1T21mqvIWm6UngD VZTBAB+WkYy4hRdvN/Vs8j1dFoaFtueiinhhDT2g7EW/XJHL1EA5//yAYJLngW6uBE7Z Q0HgzvLfwxjWI3zjHmubOMsba49kY6T4FSDnOKSgBgkPCNG143I+55X94We4PhL7tOSf E+yzy9n85IMAsAlUN0YDgCYERWjU8JiDQFGPN4WYlJgsOcoLzdtFMSFhfakq98Dz/All rWuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pFGtMhMWMOZpUFCxwJLAmxUHZfrpdi7UaZRSRowhw5cU4ZPz1 7mGB7jkoBXRG4dNwG+wzszWAsbivRsUO9Uh3OB+yV+ph0EOEqLTKgQYbLYZSZB6zM18lnutvVPP nZAI6Z15NZFqyCvN5GVOwMMytIgdFvMlqaJS7o2Fd X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:f0b:: with SMTP id v11mr34114352qkl.243.1641292480655; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 02:34:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylFS5vqugRPnbqJj9K0Whj966vHmOvDbOpUcxUm7MMvESmsTFHwK1N2lQq/sApURHvQGHjC8oQs/ncDnpLG3I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:f0b:: with SMTP id v11mr34114340qkl.243.1641292480444; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 02:34:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211220075957.634283-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:34:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 19.11.11 (RC2) patches review and test To: "stable@dpdk.org" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "benjamin.walker@intel.com" , Ian Stokes , John McNamara , Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi , Pei Zhang , "pingx.yu@intel.com" , "qian.q.xu@intel.com" , "yuan.peng@intel.com" , "zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" , "Jiang, YuX" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Done my own testing as well, for the logs; Canonical(R) Testing * Build tests of DPDK & OVS 2.13.3 on Ubuntu 20.04 (meson based) * Functional and performance tests based on OVS-DPDK on x86_64 * Autopkgtests for DPDK and OpenvSwitch The former other use case of 19.11 was Ubuntu 20.10 but that no longer is an active release and therefore skipped. Checking past verification logs I have all the usual suspects for 19.11.11 completed, except one. We are missing "[Intel(R) Testing with Open vSwitch]" As these threads grew out of control chances are quite high that someone submitted it but I fail to see/find it. I even have the feeling I already asked this and got a positive response, but I fail to find something referrable like a mailing list link. So please bear with me and send me a link to the dpdk mailing list archive entry that you stated your tests as done.