From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4226A0A0A for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 07:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC444067A; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 07:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294B54067A for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 07:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f199.google.com ([209.85.222.199]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>) id 1log4f-0004By-QP for stable@dpdk.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 05:39:21 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id j14-20020a05620a146eb02903a928cc3769so3502348qkl.7 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:39:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/eP0JD7/YlqmpIg75/Ahzly5mAUxr56b9VaxHK3ROLs=; b=qDreUCLEUOcv6O3OLtrqGplnHXwCICNLka1HSmf+oXeouQMlw373qguyD5ffF3gatL zmuOTuIU8AjdbyWxBXJbJdvsU3gBD9SvDKytAUTTfhzQrsJJ12C6ixl6TFEahpTv5kzS A7SnC5S0ACcI7HS2nnfkYKbSHy+KLfR71A2yxbJu+Q6QJeKxoWs+Zz5HQRw6ejpBcR6M Bv4gm9gFbqE60z3DB/XUqmQ+CVkY1YZ8WtottZS6eJ/WSqDVFI6HPYGkglgyc3SA/WBs naK9I0pdRdEI4L309PBgSLTEkiCcd26gjf5xSNrvA4R2JOb51nMfX5gYrT0YLQjXxjbq 7MAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530a0RugIDx5z/DkRQd7mS6e5WF5Xh6aWmHXuYuS+qz/l0OucnQS HVI9wsuubrW9ZdE9vDcX+U9+Mkx0RBVzoPc1QnRYV2PApVaDvdPYGAYTVvOp+lDXfgaH79LHmbc L1QcaNHmyxlnV+ubMmXb1jJV0hUQTQWt0XzoSg1g+ X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c4b:: with SMTP id o11mr28114141qtv.336.1622698760957; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:39:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjUVzGfcAQeAqlE6UunIReUsm5tXXTXmxZ9LqTyYdne9Gr72d/UYi54+3FHdSeMUHBBOj47u1oTOISnILeGM0= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c4b:: with SMTP id o11mr28114125qtv.336.1622698760367; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:39:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <DM5PR11MB1401AD92A56AAE00675730B08C249@DM5PR11MB1401.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAATJJ0KZoBnkQQ278vi6LpiQoA36KuKhjhwCquH0cUwm+uMb+A@mail.gmail.com> <6340038.7RWX4JVtyS@thomas> In-Reply-To: <6340038.7RWX4JVtyS@thomas> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 07:38:54 +0200 Message-ID: <CAATJJ0LzsgT6f7d1mE9Z+tEjQTAEJ63KAydkmOyHKgA1upB5bQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: "Yu, DapengX" <dapengx.yu@intel.com>, "Yu, PingX" <pingx.yu@intel.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] It there plan to queue this patch to stable release 19.11.9 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/> List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:01 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 31/05/2021 11:21, Christian Ehrhardt: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:13 AM Yu, DapengX <dapengx.yu@intel.com> wrote: > > > This patch: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-March/029204.html > > > > This patch actually was never merged in the main branch > > On main we have: > > > > commit f93949c3afc39b0f610e0661f7baa21060ada13a > > Author: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com> > > net/ice: fix memory leak on dev closed > > > > This one also refers to bd513ece3c40 for a fix and was in 19.11 already. > > Then quite similar to what you referred to, but a more generic (all > > drivers) fix on the main branch > > > > commit 30410493759f4bae3f65497737661e27b93c2d0e > > Author: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> > > drivers/net: check process type in close operation > > See => https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/30410493759f4bae3f65497737661e27b93c2d0e > > > > This one was in 20.11 but not targeted for stable@dpdk.org > > > > The patch almost applies but since the change is mostly the same to > > all drivers it seems backportable. > > > > Maybe if you could sync with Thomas if this (general) solution is > > applicable and prepare the backport we can add it. > > It is close as I wanted to call for RC1 already, but if done soon it > > should be fine. > > I'll hold back 19.11.9-RC1 another day to give this a chance to be > > clarified until tomorrow. > > > > @Dapeng please talk to Thomas and consider providing a 19.11.9 > > backport of the fix that made it into the main branch. > > @Thomas Monjalon was there a specific reason/prereq which made you not > > targeting stable@ with the fix? > > It was not considered as a fix but a behaviour improvement :) > I agree it could be backported. FYI - by now it is backported and part of the WIP 19.11.9 > -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd