From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C916F1DC18 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id r125-v6so12040480wmg.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:31:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=41yjtTUJAEBp/nO8Ad31Yvxcl2BSgxNcoGr3k5JpOyg=; b=zZ/MBWWZHG2XkTpNmAGxwHRzsIlfUrLksi5dGtOm91QgEvpLhppU0u3dBfwm79dJsd qOSaRD7YXy3MiV7AnziijF75RKOejfAF+0ASO0ogYvotj7eEWtV/XF/y02dEMWszitNl EYrZk9J50WxjNkAO1GNEdEnRA9e/wmxcLDWheXEVeOFnp7XaHYq5KdHU8PSbROuhJhES lM/jiLhj54qt+Xnd07WwAsGbD9WOUCSIYFIa7nb2ZYG2x521zhTm0fhNQDLxTeQ9YnOe 3a1ZK6/dvvy3S59hGHDpIjDsYJeJlc6dH6PErPhy1SoSJ5LwTwT/CKC9dUSUBtMXEoSw WYBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=41yjtTUJAEBp/nO8Ad31Yvxcl2BSgxNcoGr3k5JpOyg=; b=EUmFFQJQD1lP4UQVesC/WtoWcsP1FSYNW/ELRds8d+mY9bJwzY/PsBecALw+URIqmB tBs4wBHFsXVYa2wLgvcs8qHE1HGABvftuaUKTqiYoVLtZmhVZ+ZYh0in+29CZScGIHNa WNKG1iAsEgxh1YDTndPiPruw27opjS69yyeqCavmvafLpYmlFGE29alOqhYes/Q7S2RA wGZ/usjDi3mYvVtsQokkW2bpEQmaOKLVx2sDeu7sBKqBpBJ9+qGcZ4V/L1QZ7FHprG2L KA0tB8fcMmOuiXz3LPu+Zr+FRWx69pqqw/SKGbYA2PBtDsmQfR7tCslZIkD0bcaeiDPO xnmA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1qd1SfokHC2PwDcrAMJ2lazu+j1eWeufRBqiGZKvv0FyoF9Rr9 u8TfaSlL3P/w58K+ocXSd7Z7gz8iKjFm88sqP+toYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKILE5WuvaCct6F6/tiJ7O9GgDjsWo1lKZ69aUnzkC4c50Bhzrba8AJEyEwjnTNwr+aGh04O54k6U0MXEYaMoPs= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9622:: with SMTP id y31-v6mr2723011eda.32.1528983065590; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:31:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a50:b197:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:31:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fce857c-9103-30a1-b8a4-6b8150a721d0@intel.com> References: <1528710637-8313-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <4fce857c-9103-30a1-b8a4-6b8150a721d0@intel.com> From: Alejandro Lucero Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev , stable@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/nfp: fix field initialization in TX descriptor X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:31:06 -0000 Hi Ferruh, On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/11/2018 10:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > TX descriptor eop_offset field is not initialized and it could > > contain garbage. This patch fixes the potential problem setting > > EOP as the only subfield. The other subfield, data offset, is > > not used by now. > > > > Fixes: b812daadad0d ("nfp: add Rx and Tx") > > > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero > > Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > Thanks! > stable flag: > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > is the way to ask patches to be merged to stable trees. > In this patch is stable flag forgotten or intentionally not added? > > I have added stable flag, but if this was intentionally left out please > let me > know so that I can remove it back. > I though it was enough ccing to stable. I will add that flag in the commit from now on. Thanks