From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3965A0353 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:42:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E601840E03; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:42:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f172.google.com (mail-pg1-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26DE40041; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:42:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f172.google.com with SMTP id h125so5473859pgc.3; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:42:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yfCyiKyC3odQoBkil5x3RX9JBnUTNxfTrwtB1Fmec74=; b=PNftPQB59R+7bEEx6TtkrkdxvyB7LLXRpPeYc2UV4cfuKfJJZPVDzblxa+4MRf5HNQ a08qLBjYvlNPR5ifOBX+gIF1e+uUa3u4MmRFFBzL7nO4lBuo6Sc6Phiyri2IZRgy8jrC 1iowufPdOBA7Sm0ZJ88PMdYgGULWKly3jReD2H/iIAHnAZ3AXpy0dBG5G1QRPIYKIwZV 9geu+xakR/yodGLgHvKK4+eS1zZToeGsIdUKcj0l4P7pdqFcvInVyeUACUS00qsaSkfm WOz+jmGjBQHaeHpw79mJfUvYlYgS0WHR4psKZGkZrTC06GS/PRySkaY7nkI4IGJWwPY4 D40Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yfCyiKyC3odQoBkil5x3RX9JBnUTNxfTrwtB1Fmec74=; b=gJx80G+fStbstki5lSDRlezScA2mwdjTWy+R12L9G+MzsZCti80cENpmRIngAW8+x4 xVW/b88mF8DtXwFRnLGevIse4Zfqc2QY6Xik+F4gQzOr21qurtcW/kEfWuoD/LDLs9F8 Nu8i6hrO1pBAGeDiHmCIsBaw5UzgnzisU1/WG6MdV3XbvIBwM0d5v0U+GbFkOh9jlaof cmxMDF/7AmyD+gHcVTzqW+78kPI+QCMimjBs0uCU+xFv5KHlOdHdilsWRK96z4WjnY4N lytNnyVAj+e7H91ZgPQB6sOQN8VDnIKgmlglWzuqGAqltwEqIluqup/0Ni3PTnQu4Cbf MkaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+mpF5YlbmV6JM/C7hEGeQ28NqxNp+WO4bAYmssF273E9F1kiL Pe++b/gsvXc8iblEsnUEft/6ZneOKpk2wt+YqjUkI8wsE2E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyc/P8Gi3LCZRhftbbUXZtIk9aXzqDuvlH6UoR7WietuXiBsnR2D6gW/mPzHl6TC5Rhne7rc5jJWH+BpXdRAVk= X-Received: by 2002:a63:698a:: with SMTP id e132mr2986192pgc.14.1643992933047; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:42:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220115194102.444140-1-lucp.at.work@gmail.com> <20220117153711.32829-1-lucp.at.work@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20220117153711.32829-1-lucp.at.work@gmail.com> From: Luc Pelletier Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:42:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] eal: fix unaligned loads/stores in rte_memcpy_generic To: bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com Cc: dev , Xiaoyun Li , dpdk stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, It's been several days and I haven't received any additional feedback on this patch (and the other patch related to this one: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2022-January/232491.html). I would welcome any kind of feedback. Ideally, I'm hoping an authoritative voice would indicate if there's any interest in updating rte_memcpy and if so, comment on the different possible solutions presented thus far in this thread. Thanks