From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA65CA0562 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744794014D; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660CC40147 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620110684; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sHjx/PWrtbS2cdHkMANT4I9x3r5t1Vh+jIcA10by9ZI=; b=KhbyffjUdI8lzRpiJfs7T9nq3Zg/LykEiAYtK8mSii9gRZizMeb476PtIJnuQuwkGb476c rtKz22oXTzDEkOeVi54HZt7sivMGmducc49kbaG+O5qxX51TyXij6MOtG7hmgRMfub/bDj ZQd9sw80Oq/0xkaJt1hBSKltkMkgP40= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-36-xt-oM6PMN-6YFxLJGMqh6g-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 02:44:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xt-oM6PMN-6YFxLJGMqh6g-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l6-20020a67d5060000b0290228235bc72dso384570vsj.13 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sHjx/PWrtbS2cdHkMANT4I9x3r5t1Vh+jIcA10by9ZI=; b=DsPLu13yQ0UIc21MBYbZaKspAzxtZyAfVLrWxrWuUAoFKdJeIIYREsnSYVhqqYPXTJ 6cSKx/LYEtbzHK/sKMfdhNJ78zmkcQFUkl5b1fuziHDggQTflwT49Xc4g3llRCPjHTxC Lq0vptVUvXspfb1SxIWDJYysf21yzsREhRNNDHbL+thVdyAGuS+W1UMECXKZ8IEC3pOl po2LQYX+5g0nBFLPcRN6T/4hKk8rHtbnj+AiyAUeNWXLoE6U/pZR+IlN7/vukuU8HVB3 lAr2LG0Vp3kijDc+k/ovOqjL1D32kYlbLU9AGBUk362RTxOgjobdFDMtnAx1XYD7GJ3t kamw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WYXs26v4F748KbFmzk6N2eo0fpFSHLtpUHajkpf0PeacNGC22 iKaloAq3vk9XGbvkOYp20447+z3p20HTN+9s4uOcUAWQ3OO/JPRImiIg1iwqSG0HpMKvSssLT28 O8JkMVHNIIvt+hwINvg/GnWM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:127b:: with SMTP id q27mr19632731vsg.27.1620110682442; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHYRoGeMyy5MbHK6/JCeYmG3Axffty3+3J+agfRoG6G3w9rkbJj+0TrfsMnKRsHbTE1p2bYCbInWRMnfZVU9M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:127b:: with SMTP id q27mr19632719vsg.27.1620110682216; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210412082901.652736-1-kda@semihalf.com> <20210503142857.GB1726@platinum> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw_Kardach?= Cc: Olivier Matz , Luca Boccassi , Christian Ehrhardt , dev , dpdk stable , Kevin Traynor , Thomas Monjalon , upstream@semihalf.com Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lock-free stack support discovery X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:35 PM Stanis=C5=82aw Kardach wr= ote: > On Mon, 3 May 2021, 16:28 Olivier Matz, wrote: >> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:21:25PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:29 AM Stanislaw Kardach = wrote: >> > > >> > > I have added cc to stable@dpdk.org because check-git-log.sh suggeste= d it. I'm >> > > not sure if adding a binary compatible change to API is worth stable= @dpdk.org. >> > > >> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >> > >> > The issue was hit while porting to a new architecture. >> > The feature is broken in existing stable releases and it won't get >> > fixed by this change. >> > >> > I'd rather not backport it. >> > >> > Opinions? >> >> Agreed. > > Agreed. Ok, thanks. I'll take this series dropping Cc: stable. --=20 David Marchand