From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87318A0352 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623191C231; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BCD1C223 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579173922; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hoN2ORsi/BPGWUGs4KHhMZZAtUMkAB7J5WaFh/UGbBM=; b=is5mT7gVE0r0Go4rnmK2Ea9jgULkQOtdI1gtCSh9QUi4bebv0UBLxk1FSuw2ix0eBVE1pa 8ngiZPXZgwHNIME+YGNRVap04FdkZZ5NDOHKWhW6xcgD4Op4u9nOTWbReghpYijn6GPRnV HVyZ3KQ1AtEDbVHMT8KrWR76SHZavTk= Received: from mail-ua1-f69.google.com (mail-ua1-f69.google.com [209.85.222.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-229-olzxfAGUOneRCoCn59i9Cw-1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 06:25:18 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f69.google.com with SMTP id n23so3138106uao.2 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DOfhbK7yTOecGXc8fgHd+Ojlwdxhol4n08DLxtq6DG0=; b=YvKl5rejX1zxCHciPq7GkH7Mn5BsUBCFeUtLEk5PaPlF12XcWJwuNtTFFCO1sDHOwc HxTHOmlyF2QFf6ZjM5PNd8ss1AG9HaZO32IXo9TUUPV0xsE0mXCZeHiEOjYqDhLqvDX2 WC71CymQgeSccCS5vuvtOlkz9WydbAf1t7MgwRpTachrTaU8jonoo3VFIObzAY42qi2t 5f0CJSIHFIdOp1CpZ1qGY8DosdCxj0BVoTQCLzWUc13M9gdGf3jkeS5IXSYc7E0jM4Cm DPcz7/bxZinZ9zEcV3gbxuo+UwczfU1bsIctpwxAJpOIx8gRqVJH6FQ+cBtHQ1JW0Vyi /4nA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+oTtxNnR5lUjh6rIkBP+uz7Ri51wOnn0MqHz8MRh1dK88N/ZE wzo3q7QoBaTo8Dk4nvd4G61XQJM+V41CJVX/55XX2idQ5nf1CirboXIyMOv8GLkIdg86qnmR6Ge xzgEkt2+oWNBiHf2zQHBP3NI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:20ca:: with SMTP id i10mr1113215vsr.105.1579173917417; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzV2Lh2EU1UIn6Tk8QgsGazim2+7IWXan9Ya1j8+OhjoscfCUf/zUvPlXggN/KIi2GqfHRVvH8cm3XZEzuqnaI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:20ca:: with SMTP id i10mr1113204vsr.105.1579173917131; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191217130742.165886.15691.stgit@netdev64> In-Reply-To: <20191217130742.165886.15691.stgit@netdev64> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ray Kinsella , Thomas Monjalon , Neil Horman Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu , dpdk stable , dev , Eelco Chaudron , Kevin Traynor , Ian Stokes , Ilya Maximets , Luca Boccassi , "Yigit, Ferruh" X-MC-Unique: olzxfAGUOneRCoCn59i9Cw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] meter: move RFC4115 trTCM APIs as none experimental X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:08 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > Moved RFC4115 APIs to none experimental as they have been there > since 19.02. Also, these APIs are the same as the none RFC4115 APIs. > > Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron There is a discussion on the OVS ml at the moment to get these symbols in the stable ABI for 19.11. I want to understand how this would be done. - I take this patch in 20.02, these symbols are added in the 20.0.1 ABI. On the other hand, the 19.11 release maintains the 20.0 ABI. Does it mean the backport adds these symbols with the 20.0 version in the 19.11 branch? Or is 20.0.1 version acceptable / a thing we want? - These symbol already existed in the 20.0 ABI, versioned as EXPERIMENTAL. We can go and remove these entries since we are not bound to preserve the experimental APIs. But, on the other hand, nothing should prevent us from keeping some aliases so that the symbols versioned EXPERIMENTAL are still available to existing users. --=20 David Marchand