From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8FF41EB2 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02BB42D61; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AAE40DDC for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1678980975; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XKt8sY1+qZkFtdAObaaZVO7rKUloPaBgKcFnLRDRWNk=; b=WufikrmDINxoCaiaSDTzwiGXhI7SX8FwRHf36PArfNqnTAgg8vpu8NTkWzqoQtc97tsx6K FFMMqfIfxMzMBlYRT1vElbYq3aJKJjYD5TCuvoyNhBCBbXSUFkugkUQX9PtxqeTFdscNQQ mpZeQWmzHsF3HxMVH3EPbi2e2dBh7AM= Received: from mail-pl1-f199.google.com (mail-pl1-f199.google.com [209.85.214.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-625-gikAXXf9N5CnUB--fjSnxw-1; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:36:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gikAXXf9N5CnUB--fjSnxw-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f199.google.com with SMTP id t24-20020a1709028c9800b0019eaa064a51so1185062plo.10 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678980971; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XKt8sY1+qZkFtdAObaaZVO7rKUloPaBgKcFnLRDRWNk=; b=S+Fv49CxIVQr7Qo+jg9ILTpEVghEqk7Wb2BYJWNAxsJ4rbWfy+CntD8xHNlyoVYATo f1rKk17sT7n5LUYHxjTj1zd+o7gXhjx1ivRy8LnJ88IqHj7bonD4CCeTx+OaD/DMzKZy UNhSUJ/IXMpfMdgDInnd5ifaTeVi9wL4ld+XF+XUcA1DZ3K+amI1PY+fNoRn2voHeWrh 4PBNtlx+gc9Dao3Uu2tAP46gLoAjIBqw74BQebzxkKIkW0p3t/KBAzQvotdADF9sNnfD WSEfzuoNnM1KYt0szFk/H4HbEHzqLW7xJKwEsdFSAE89dNFZgOisOj+zhswC3fnRAiTh 749g== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXjT9uYA7nDArzuYnXh68uriiAtOwz/yHS/S0mJCC9X7YYJUsTZ 2cuJ8mtAfJ2u3TwMy5qlF3EbvFk65SL+89whmY5efcq9YhFkxJdCpJFKxl3ORATriXohVAJeADF Xdr0G1k3rir4hkoUc32TziSI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a11:b0:625:f78a:56f with SMTP id p17-20020a056a000a1100b00625f78a056fmr910843pfh.3.1678980971392; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9zFuoxjBMfQVKSSalE8co+CX1ATDgYS7WVPcKyX2r/2CL4lMV66o1PrJdCGAWQxzeS0FxQeomnz4NF2tJq7FA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a11:b0:625:f78a:56f with SMTP id p17-20020a056a000a1100b00625f78a056fmr910836pfh.3.1678980971117; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230313093450.2560058-1-vfialko@marvell.com> <20230313130428.2650232-1-vfialko@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reorder: fix registration of dynamic field in mbuf To: "Pattan, Reshma" Cc: Volodymyr Fialko , "dev@dpdk.org" , Andrew Rybchenko , Stephen Hemminger , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Anoob Joseph , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Mcnamara, John" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:47=E2=80=AFPM Pattan, Reshma wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Marchand > > > A gentle reminder, please review and ack/comment. > > > Can we have this merged before RC3? > > > > I did not go into depth this time, the fix seems ok. > > Reshma, please review. > Unfortunately do not have a bandwidth to review this. I am ok if someone = who already reviewed ACKs this. That's a pity. I don't think there is a huge amount of work on this library. I would have expected one review every other month or so is acceptable. The fix looks correct to me, nobody objects, I'll take it as is. --=20 David Marchand