From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBA9A0032 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:43:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE8A40042; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A4C40042 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:43:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633185796; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4ZoIiHIL2JZp5u5MT5VkNmzv3fRaRxoWJ7det58Ep3s=; b=JjcSz3+njxiSwhWuaGZg0WPry1qEsB/U5wgDtz6R+PgN1KTRVRBxXXxtXHOtNDpIeA+CX0 dlSHebTfLX8Qq3YL0EHh5cfvjdw5Ig9VhVPIQEK+4qmL46D1R+1Z/yMIjJ4o2gS3riIKWk AxQIpG08hCLrfW2x4j1cwZVFL1ntQAU= Received: from mail-lf1-f71.google.com (mail-lf1-f71.google.com [209.85.167.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-540-u_qjPrUWPzedrlD-tc0uWg-1; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:43:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: u_qjPrUWPzedrlD-tc0uWg-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f71.google.com with SMTP id o4-20020a056512230400b003fc39bb96c7so11002055lfu.8 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 07:43:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4ZoIiHIL2JZp5u5MT5VkNmzv3fRaRxoWJ7det58Ep3s=; b=N6DHf1+k4JTYrZ0vdOGVjzYF5zWX+ZspwgFN8rWOhXVwiTnvLxo6kcmSK+5IDF2fzB p9qCDlhmVvsZLETayLrnylzvlaFVKdFpds7VWKbRDrD7EJL4yLHlXvHn33oddhTygrSa gLquS3hS2ktUz5B7RNTEyU8/rdb/NhaOByPegW4Pl4vLKRVNr0G3DDd7waPh7obeSi5q YBwZ6xXGm6qjIHSgeTBjTXaRNsVXDcGG3lTecvuEYXSBWAQU4CEVs087CIhFCKWoYAUn UatRoL5EEkNM6xfZ7PStbMZUMYaZ2PoRAqeQGvirelDzvuA/E84eutE6xp0lpi4L4edI Znsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lBTFT0WfnMTYgBnd/Z9mEjoNc1j3S36bxCLmII7Iol2/vHKD4 DJVUalg8cUFJvCtoCkkCmOpu9WuRipsyqT0H4+KnjrDGeV/yViP6FLU8rPfRPaiG/+8r+zqDlLv 41eiFUoWT6A8Isf6yedfe7AQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr4026747ljv.46.1633185792004; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 07:43:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhlqtdZumPorJBxk2Zx3Jtp6+5QAX1YSbgACBpjGxS/MWph3tCoPSLFI+P+xAWqyFZgsZjAUYjBYVgLK1pGl8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr4026736ljv.46.1633185791809; Sat, 02 Oct 2021 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210913110635.130387-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <48d75bc2-ae55-183c-8132-6e3e150647af@intel.com> <YT9T+sxJPLtzKBGu@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <b7675eaf-711a-0a06-f600-a4916580cc3b@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <b7675eaf-711a-0a06-f600-a4916580cc3b@intel.com> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 16:43:00 +0200 Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x7NNQqeDq2VVSZdNYqfegfzvF2c3guoBC+x1T-=2kCPg@mail.gmail.com> To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/freebsd: lock memory device to prevent conflicts X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/> List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote: > >> I'm a bit uneasy with --in-memory mode pretending to work on > >> FreeBSD and Windows, but that's a separate problem :) > > > > Yes, it is, though one that does belong is the same area as this one. The > > "fix" is probably to just print a warning when --in-memory is used, > > informing the user that the flag is ignored and then continue. > > Alternatively we can error out, but I think the warn+continue is better, > > myself. > > I think erroring out is better. The feature is intended to work a > certain way, so if we can't guarantee that it does, we can't pretend it > is "supported" or "is working". But again, irrelevant to this patch :) > Please, can you review https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210913140848.184928-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com/ ? Thanks. -- David Marchand