From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v3 5/9] trace: fix dynamically enabling trace points
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:19:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xT6bOdDzOLNPDbRQKqxydYrgWCsDYApVat4YCsL_mrLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1P9eV5QFs7DK=cmy6ieDoU19D5=37qjXqPLfxp=BcJaVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 6:27 AM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:41 AM David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 7:07 PM Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With the whole traces fixes series applied first, then the new "trace:
> > > > take live traces via telemetry" patch applied, I can't reproduce your issue.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, you replicated the same scenario what I tried.
> > > Sorry, I realized that actually it's not an issue, traces generated after /trace/save are getting
> > > appended but in the same file (timestamped on /trace/save) on rte_eal_cleanup().
> > >
> > > I assumed that trace dir generated with a timestamp will include all the trace points emitted
> > > before that timestamp. But in the above scenario same trace dir includes trace points emitted
> > > after this timestamp. I think this is bit confusing. Shall we add a logic where if already_done is
> > > set, rename the original trace dir to latest timestamp?
> >
> > Afaiu, the behavior before this series was the same.
> > An application calling rte_trace_save() would always save to a single directory.
> > One thing that changed though is that the directory is timestamped
> > with the time of the first call to rte_trace_save.
> > Before the seriesn the timestamp was based on the time when the trace
> > subsystem was initialised.
> >
> >
> > We can go with what you describe (which makes sense to me).
> > But I'd like to get a ack from traces maintainers before looking into it.
>
> IMO, We can remove "already_done" logic, whenever, rte_trace_save()
> called, it creates
> the directory of that timestamp and copies the trace buffers. Since we
> have "overwrite" and "discard"
> modes, it is better to not add "already_done" dogic in rte_trace_save().
Well, it's a bit more difficult than just removing already_done.
Before my changes, the timestamp was decided and the directory created
once and for all at init.
On the other hand, every trace_mkdir() call resulted in a
trace_dir_update() call.
--> /trace/save
{"/trace/save": {"Status": "OK", "Path":
"/home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-08-39-37"}}
--> /trace/save
{"/trace/save": {"Status": "OK", "Path":
"/home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-08-39-37rte-2022-10-14-AM-08-39-38"}}
I prototyped a change (which deserves a separate patch).
Testing it, there is still one corner case when calling
rte_trace_save() twice in the same minute:
--> /trace/save
{"/trace/save": {"Status": "OK", "Path":
"/home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-10-11-19"}}
--> /trace/save
{"/trace/save": {"Status": "KO", "Path":
"/home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-10-11-19"}}
EAL: Trace dir: /home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-10-11-19
EAL: trace_mkdir():321 mkdir
/home/dmarchan/dpdk-traces/rte-2022-10-14-AM-10-11-19 failed [File
exists]
What do you suggest for this?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220921120359.2201131-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] trace: fix mode for new trace point David Marchand
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] trace: fix mode change David Marchand
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] trace: fix leak with regexp David Marchand
2022-09-22 11:00 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-09-23 6:35 ` David Marchand
2022-09-23 7:37 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] trace: fix dynamically enabling trace points David Marchand
2022-09-22 11:18 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-09-23 6:36 ` David Marchand
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] trace: fix race in debug dump David Marchand
2022-10-11 14:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-09-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] trace: fix metadata dump David Marchand
[not found] ` <20221004094418.196544-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] trace: fix mode for new trace point David Marchand
2022-10-11 14:16 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 9:05 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] trace: fix mode change David Marchand
2022-10-11 14:20 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 9:07 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] trace: fix leak with regexp David Marchand
2022-10-11 14:21 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 9:10 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] trace: fix dynamically enabling trace points David Marchand
2022-10-12 9:23 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-12 9:57 ` David Marchand
2022-10-12 10:15 ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] trace: fix race in debug dump David Marchand
2022-10-12 9:25 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2022-10-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] trace: fix metadata dump David Marchand
2022-10-12 9:28 ` [EXT] " Sunil Kumar Kori
[not found] ` <20221012123112.2951802-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] trace: fix mode for new trace point David Marchand
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] trace: fix mode change David Marchand
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] trace: fix leak with regexp David Marchand
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] trace: fix dynamically enabling trace points David Marchand
2022-10-13 14:53 ` [EXT] " Harman Kalra
2022-10-13 15:51 ` David Marchand
2022-10-13 17:07 ` Harman Kalra
2022-10-13 19:10 ` David Marchand
2022-10-14 4:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-14 8:19 ` David Marchand [this message]
2022-10-14 8:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] trace: fix race in debug dump David Marchand
2022-10-12 12:31 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] trace: fix metadata dump David Marchand
[not found] ` <20221018132654.3760561-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] trace: fix mode for new trace point David Marchand
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] trace: fix mode change David Marchand
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] trace: fix leak with regexp David Marchand
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] trace: fix dynamically enabling trace points David Marchand
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] trace: fix race in debug dump David Marchand
2022-10-18 13:26 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] trace: fix metadata dump David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xT6bOdDzOLNPDbRQKqxydYrgWCsDYApVat4YCsL_mrLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).