From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52F1A04B6 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B6B1D6C4; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:12:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8C71D6BC for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:12:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602515541; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i1r6jL7+NwkDU+onzqQzMpXZlSb2QYNXRbVicSyXm14=; b=KtELsna9oeSg7TKFFKddBzXds7iGFseTXs5gEE1EXbxwR6b+14c8NDF5M+oFYvnx3a1OSz hzwbrVEEPhBcI4fpWaf+6errQFwVFupge8ke4PwWBBw7nJCJCd3G6RPPC3bArpb9UCnvo8 PsAhNYtRfOucJn+DhABio1ix22FCbqo= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-464-dbrIvcjyO4yJALwrbZrebA-1; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:12:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dbrIvcjyO4yJALwrbZrebA-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id f19so2632268vsp.10 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i1r6jL7+NwkDU+onzqQzMpXZlSb2QYNXRbVicSyXm14=; b=JUrWOw65+wKB/D1CZLkpCJF8Mo/ZaRfR9sfsmRL7eXyWvTw4Tll/+qKFv2JSVzIhpy C4cT2Q6da9H4YaQJL3fav+rDeWUg27rY/7I2063LxbmyVF0Pi7daReMnz4fPa3ThmtWu 2BujCHMcQNCPpT58BIjBYeiO3fRrI7pFPLyhpXGMubVlv7RISXj+1GzHc/c50/hqSy6G khYQE0w00l6frLJPVFRJbLdLFaub2x/c4xrumV7B+thC2ce1WT/Hlwzzcui9JufFhQd0 W8OyvDvB64v8g1nrhkNQV+NL4W2vz/GFqf1PJ3PHhIcBOAtj72Wxstgxd607y1WsZMVN xBgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533O8xVOt/NBBgcP8hBewt71zPC56RNdjREHK3OWDi87xchcNtLD vG0H3nKtgTPq8RxRzyAJ+8VUSgBrgdgcxFGGPiY3xKg3uAxnC2n4VUs8P3JBBgwFhgto7I1ZUJ7 Z3IZtseNGb2PWnYGCpLP99I4= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4287:: with SMTP id j7mr13179299uaj.53.1602515538166; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqQOMEH3VvA8OUieEbLBYOoVlSO7PmT+J2CuCoX3g3TPjLvxKFRJK/kY6is3w8bmBMLzTPlmwKY87/G3RvEWU= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4287:: with SMTP id j7mr13179284uaj.53.1602515537950; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:12:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201008170536.124111-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20201009141914.205284-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:12:06 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev , Luca Boccassi , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] build: skip detecting libpcap via pcap-config X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:54 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 15:19 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > When compiling for a slightly different architecture, e.g. 32-bit on 64-bit > > systems using CFLAGS rather than a cross-file, the pcap-config utility can > > often return parameters that are unusable for the build in question, i.e. > > providing the native 64-bit library paths rather than checking for 32-bit > > equivalent. > > > > Since many distros now include a version of libpcap with a > > pkg-config file, and for those that don't find-library should work ok as a > > fallback, we can explicitly just use pkg-config in the dependency search, > > causing meson to skip trying to use pcap-config. > > CC: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > Reviewed-by: Luca Boccassi Tested-by: David Marchand Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand