From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411E1A04BA for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:13:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BD71B696; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6001B696 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:13:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601885609; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xgeOkijfkhhSmPMv4n3JRTVMzDGc4JB+iiP+X9gB2BQ=; b=iA4b+zDYhIR5XBVU/GZdn5Nn99/r6zmNERJWc2eHKCoJ6CYAhUbNFLQb3QqczMXPD/zYFu Q6/E3qe6clfQjLD5rqWbHRR0LZCwlmtdTXgkQiVjYgCdM29ul86cAiYekyafrgEx+tF8zU ZCYqt+izyvOI0RnISRsxYxaOoCVhVZk= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-wXOd6fpdMhyNv31xtScZxQ-1; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 04:13:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wXOd6fpdMhyNv31xtScZxQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id e9so1993051vso.7 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:13:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xgeOkijfkhhSmPMv4n3JRTVMzDGc4JB+iiP+X9gB2BQ=; b=gGoSmlalu1E0oa44fNRBd8W90qUD402++qjmkMfKTWaeg6Kme2g3nT+V1JzS/hciZA V4n8wXSo0VNAB0HgDHCpaWrNtZHmoIFortztxKvfNWC26Pvb8vn4swvDh4cUpoYiuk0C kUXjFvHC/BWc/WSEmRxSio/G4byGswIqD2EmVKijlmggbjHsdErQz7OyW84e8VAtHCMx JK9WcQhDfccnbxY0wbaClHOwOC7AjwcIXSgpX/ySH3IMD+jCEGfyhoiDM80K0l5UdN3l aRZOr3bASWFirhwLyA7PEAYwSj1vBuhfp/tSeGQPgMDOEmclVnqEvsArkDn00Sny6+wm ca3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XnHjAeOPEF9+nS0vDoYmEj2XmmmnfumleFvINCI9VMTE35/mz GqMApJ+KvI6OeN+CdF5ZzRvqM3bCXxMXrpsH3OA1HqyOV0fB3Lp5cAzTsQNvqMNhLhYBgrKwV5a uiwARg8lUgRORZQzV0KnZwnA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd44:: with SMTP id g4mr5887500vsr.18.1601885606983; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:13:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+Tcp9TwokZdmFJvQbsZuT/pUlZ4GvRY+lxhkTQwpuTSE/HJ6lDgOGVuVoSipvF+ixccsxbZcY9aR8ulwF76I= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd44:: with SMTP id g4mr5887489vsr.18.1601885606793; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:13:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200614140034.E5CDC49E0@dpdk.org> <1599821862-27816-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1599821862-27816-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:13:16 +0200 Message-ID: To: wangyunjian Cc: dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Lilijun (Jerry)" , xudingke , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vfio: fix mem leak when unmapping resource X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:58 PM wangyunjian wrote: > > From: Yunjian Wang > > The 'vfio_res' is not freed when unmapping resource by primary process. > This leads to memory leak. > > Fixes: ab53203e194b ("vfio: enable unmapping resource for secondary") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand