From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C750FA050B
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  7 Apr 2022 17:24:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C6B410EF;
	Thu,  7 Apr 2022 17:24:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2D440689
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu,  7 Apr 2022 17:24:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1649345062;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=PYRfrsR3wdeoNmFuGWSszkCAQDJayWXu7l1HhQic1kk=;
 b=C7SyjMX1KjVzPKrZVaU9KKJeu2n3UexemUhn9YTRPrI6GXVkMW6w4KsfyG9pViax7OyB9u
 HMJOW/5BBSEU75pQez5wDJmFEhlhwKKCeSnGtElXFCN7yPdS1a7YAuViCp2MzrTywMP6Uw
 4D3haDFdfMl4FO98qEqvKLCJJIO9iYk=
Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com
 [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-662-TeYyRUsbP4KBGLcw2YBsvg-1; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 11:24:20 -0400
X-MC-Unique: TeYyRUsbP4KBGLcw2YBsvg-1
Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id
 v8-20020a2e7a08000000b002498273eb20so2277804ljc.7
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=PYRfrsR3wdeoNmFuGWSszkCAQDJayWXu7l1HhQic1kk=;
 b=oUME/EccR6pvc4gfZxm7GHZeHOsmxptcsjEza7SeCCgeJGa+hdXGU+BN1Uy4ehhZYP
 YnSxbWxzNjOScP6PQ2/o+EFXo/hig6DjVOZ//knbTA6SaqMV4wmrZAYxyS/de2akFWGe
 u4RAGuXF6UOJMdF24AaJtUapxL8Y+yoHI+l2s2GulayoTPRPxMMa0CvTJ1iZD0HVFN+Y
 6sqwzP8wH3jMNL0Dq5ilATjJBYmTTIn65y8q/dqPw+jkFJNKf2DqPbxB/bSEuG8piNmQ
 wD/elzRRfSgUodR6Bo2C0PwrcjAm0GjYfhXiV6t00CPfsQHw31yjI2XmtnhGadfHkRzG
 3m2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325LLNi9+Z7hyjDwD1g7SWeaiHHFmyNHbCF28hWM8VQ7xu7+TNQ
 cIDOd8bR7ZoUvaCsm9oBRtjq3N9Vu+kA5EC2iOZkHGBYPbpRoGYH1Ba41PpiR2Lhz497px6155V
 932IbYoSffckN2hTe3cmDI/8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:398a:b0:44a:56b9:c03e with SMTP id
 j10-20020a056512398a00b0044a56b9c03emr9596375lfu.553.1649345059191; 
 Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWXiBRuflpViSPugNwgSYt8zUfD6vWZdTkBC8xf04/LvgLzW8kd5ZicGUgtdls9VJswHSoQsbmu01GOFKk1ic=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:398a:b0:44a:56b9:c03e with SMTP id
 j10-20020a056512398a00b0044a56b9c03emr9596344lfu.553.1649345058847; Thu, 07
 Apr 2022 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220115194102.444140-1-lucp.at.work@gmail.com>
 <20220225163804.506142-1-lucp.at.work@gmail.com>
 <DM6PR11MB449118A6002204BEA83D1B7A9A0B9@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB449118A6002204BEA83D1B7A9A0B9@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:24:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yxK-qqQtNLrNFqyo1T+6qTSGfotSGufgR1SOY1muMzdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] eal: fix rte_memcpy strict aliasing/alignment bugs
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Luc Pelletier <lucp.at.work@gmail.com>
Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, 
 "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>, 
 Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:55 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
<konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
> > Calls to rte_memcpy for 1 < n < 16 could result in unaligned
> > loads/stores, which is undefined behaviour according to the C
> > standard, and strict aliasing violations.
> >
> > The code was changed to use a packed structure that allows aliasing
> > (using the __may_alias__ attribute) to perform the load/store
> > operations. This results in code that has the same performance as the
> > original code and that is also C standards-compliant.
> >
> > Fixes: d35cc1fe6a7a ("eal/x86: revert select optimized memcpy at run-time")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luc Pelletier <lucp.at.work@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

Thanks, applied.


> As a side note, we probably need to check other similar places in DPDK code.

What would be the best way to detect those problematic places?

I tried UBsan, and it did report some of the issues fixed with this patch.


-- 
David Marchand