From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DA24262C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:19:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC63740A8A; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:19:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8245840A7F for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:19:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695637168; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JJ6lwle63LyopVcr3HqTs/IhKcej8k/5NQvML3OEP68=; b=QYv4S7Vkfojy2tKFDHxt0xSie0hks+zyDOoePGhQ8m/BVnZs70yvSRCJhwVyin6DZBo3uW cAypIvxMWerSGIn6dq4Ts3O0N9gzy4+xMWJuAJNOZHQ5OLb52AA6Tw/b0Y1qjjmYIxiqiU +9fqOO8IB4WOT6eXQYinqOlTwjw9zn8= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-414-B9l8BJ1BM_WkGQ-01oUtQw-1; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:19:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B9l8BJ1BM_WkGQ-01oUtQw-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c13857f33aso70718771fa.0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:19:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695637165; x=1696241965; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JJ6lwle63LyopVcr3HqTs/IhKcej8k/5NQvML3OEP68=; b=Hy7B1w/F67g3pluOjrKVKrbZ5SmSUQybY5M7hXb49pBJEj+0zfNX40uTbTz7wIzjiV oB+JMOlhHmMipd/zB4QMdTo5Z8ArznJDN0JceTv86gYPceVwtM9s9zRcWmvd3VZYUkk0 dSoLhRlCZHfCtK8KxGASQXXjSju7hW4RqccxRT3bI4RLJFDvn7p2/Whewu7314MWV3N+ NyaU40OwdGolTeVkXco5+oLtXKMeQFAzCBDWE+vGOY5VPQer47EumGbgGmUSru2EP5rN xeW/6YEJtMEbkuSE/w1hv5oQd+RV/VgmPg9bV+HLKiNNLE+A87A8HQDizGl+3N1Le5+o zeoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+xV/qJIN4UiQ8d8RSGYqGh959jscCRhKWwKXZb94yR5tzD02R GK80wrpM33CZIGw26TgX4Qw/8StQpDZqR91ChyGBvowTDU2hqzQS9xj8YmSl1JD+F0afi2tRvM3 Rndif3MuFLrU9wwizR132L5g= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b005:0:b0:2bf:6852:9339 with SMTP id y5-20020a2eb005000000b002bf68529339mr5288506ljk.3.1695637165222; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:19:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGODLbAL/ytbNVaCKkAAISM9+t+wek+hr5RZBEKGUVoA2AhPaBME5xnjwavub+sVedlZYsR4DOmGMe/R7+rpcw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b005:0:b0:2bf:6852:9339 with SMTP id y5-20020a2eb005000000b002bf68529339mr5288486ljk.3.1695637164867; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:19:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230726023947.3760943-1-kaisenx.you@intel.com> <20230925094240.2122544-1-mingjinx.ye@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:19:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters To: "Ye, MingjinX" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Yang, Qiming" , "Zhou, YidingX" , "stable@dpdk.org" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:09=E2=80=AFPM Ye, MingjinX wrote: > > > In EAL related test cases, the allow parameters are not passed to the > > > secondary process, resulting in unexpected NICs being loaded. > > > > > > This patch fixes this issue by appending the allow parameters to the > > > secondary process. > > > > This patch looks wrong. > > > > Can you provide a description of the issue? > > CI/Checkpatch a warning has appeared. Marked as Superseded. > The new patch will replace it. Rather than a new patch because of some compilation issue on the implementation, please explain what you are trying to fix. It may avoid wasting time. --=20 David Marchand