From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29D4A0C4B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C27040151; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E2540151 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636189327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R28H98PqN9yw8rb/i5bJP6pBDDOhKRToKI/f/4kuCrA=; b=XEeGnr0v0EvZbd1YtHHOJB3g5Gf1wUkHPQdajyJJbF9Vdxre93ko/awGAT163sdd4WXgrs gOzIAyx1PFeTvGC3OTRtLcdP9onCaWv8LtXZO4nBoo7luKpE8pGAsEtOtZZzMLIXZhYZnT SNOrtXjyJ/JQP8MUWxeq0EwqaH4ZaS8= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-589-pLqkyfVtM8iMZO_AgH4DyA-1; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 05:02:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pLqkyfVtM8iMZO_AgH4DyA-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id bn14-20020a05651c178e00b002164a557684so3608816ljb.6 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R28H98PqN9yw8rb/i5bJP6pBDDOhKRToKI/f/4kuCrA=; b=yPESXz8cbY82QFhoM/lTM+dg/jJY6lne+LlrmZsSs+oHRR1OyMExU1PbU7BTK/Jbz9 u/rJWlzmfCe1fvLSCG2QGZjB5hg/U/A/TqVxCu+LAXOykH2U1fiRniMsTgPwySiX29LS S6t7BiUgrIvYgioxp/X4iRmUn/9oSVD/cfeyg4Y4kYMhcTwd3GSW1O/l70uOY1yIQreG hOiKkKHA0vpdzeWD36cpRKDyby/bQEdKQ+dBF6e76W0whVdG8RNvyfeoWLKaFRMHZWMR emUnxSa9Kjrs2eI5OR4a0cL1wEWDIgT6dgCueyVGWr4L7+xrbGyKF8kB5MaG7kKU9UJf bsmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530F+JjbKi6Gm9MRCdyScxt8SLr1AUdONkvfh1hapOoVzF2VE79C 7v3GPQQfRZYuQOMwqeniSLLQon9+VNL5wfw5r+qBo2CqvlIOZvlzV1L2KNbhSdVUeyx2Y96J1M0 /MY/OOCVt96Ctv85WNXlt7gQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e11:: with SMTP id i17mr57064679lfv.560.1636189323309; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7erB6b/8DcD/ESDzkN1wS8pOZyWJFwcort8SrPOD12kaS2bjiESCSW4uzxFL4X+lNDbEA+ufilF7P+qBmjnw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e11:: with SMTP id i17mr57064639lfv.560.1636189322996; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211105211031.2604275-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: <20211105211031.2604275-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: David Marchand Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:01:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev , "Iremonger, Bernard" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , David Hunt , Fan Zhang , remy.horton@intel.com, dpdk stable , Kiran Kumar K , Nithin Dabilpuram , Radu Nicolau , Akhil Goyal , John McNamara , Pavan Nikhilesh , Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , Maryam Tahhan , John J Browne Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: remove repeated repeated words X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:11 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The script devtools/check-dup-words.sh can detect some words > which are duplicated. > Err, that's one of our private checks. Good to pass it every once in a while. But checkpatch.pl itself is supposed to do a similar job for new changes. > Fixes: fdec9301f52d ("doc: add flow classify guides") > Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com > Fixes: 4dc6d8e63c16 ("doc: add graph library guide") > Cc: jerinj@marvell.com > Fixes: 30d3aa861db5 ("doc: rework VM power manager user guide") > Cc: david.hunt@intel.com > Fixes: 0d547ed03717 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support configuration file") > Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com > Fixes: e64833f2273a ("examples/l2fwd-keepalive: add sample application") > Cc: remy.horton@intel.com > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/prog_guide/graph_lib.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/keep_alive.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vm_power_management.rst | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > index f0ed5a1a04..7dae0bc8c6 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ Packet Matching > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > The ``rte_flow_classifier_query`` API is used to find packets which match a > -given flow Flow rule in the table. > +given flow rule in the table. I think the "Flow rule" form was intended. > This API calls the flow_classify_run internal function which calls the > ``table.ops.f_lookup`` API to see if any packets in a burst match any > of the Flow rules in the table. ^^^^ See here. Otherwise patch lgtm. -- David Marchand