From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589E4A04B5 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E091D58B; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:16:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B686A1B76B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:16:08 +0200 (CEST) Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601493367; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bofGFii75n9O7JZIO6ypxFXL9u1wha76Ju0+QEqx240=; b=DXaKHr8WrWpZxS6kZK3oPB1bzCExkTKBORX5UnFtJRtqgu1Cm7UhPYo7KQS1rLgMIIPP0u PYpA9fgNydcleweFrBWuHxz8+B0s7YkUEyuAiOmshWBvS9pBYJnLultXPwbVJu5OlcpqKk whbxhygEKyA28DgxJZU9V2tnthIZgmc= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-569-gfbJx24vPt6fajIYq26HXg-1; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:16:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gfbJx24vPt6fajIYq26HXg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id o68so304761vkd.17 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:16:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bofGFii75n9O7JZIO6ypxFXL9u1wha76Ju0+QEqx240=; b=QRP7+jhMWsldMJ3XE1SqJNytZ2ba5/Wzx339Cj54cyF0pCReLDPtHfsSVrrbC15DOa y4dLYBSYxE83u9xkVdYFQZd6pbw7CHG7a8w6xm7I2vBR5MseaVMAapA2NEq1urat1uj/ ez+bmGFUvZl0mxuYi3agthegjvj1C/Oq6XwHAI2a0ut4gTYaJ4lQnEssN7BtEzp8n6oi UPYlID9mpJP5CxoTwYoC+L8KhypCx2AUaFIxnUeRYS6HJYyVJ1umdbUK4uHgZUNmjpCu VEFi3TuxJUNPliQqG+ovjJI0j1q6wcv+9e4BPCKhAouG0H29fEQYCDpsLnk6cLTGmy1U 2CJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hgh0lFvVRZu45nUA3dGSRsYp2ka0hPLiU4/qkjIeLDRJd0Kht /TuebQCjVZFTexj/ljnmOa3q4p+ELHqMKyGDIgmmj9m9dh3nXs7CIyERDpNnBnIxVMN22sDzAfB KKm1PQwflqm0wAepDbI6gbW8= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:269:: with SMTP id 96mr2749478uas.41.1601493364410; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQjTnv0rShzzU70RkBxWEWaoxL2IZg68dYPuLzKLjFfI4/yMu18tUkBcXRJGbDZItcnbWprOgNsiYdKuXBgtQ= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:269:: with SMTP id 96mr2749471uas.41.1601493364244; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <389c3874a5bc2db3056b222ec48c860b96f7ad67.1601009974.git.wangyunjian@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: To: wangyunjian Cc: dev , Gage Eads , Olivier Matz , "Lilijun (Jerry)" , xudingke , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] stack: fix possible uninitialized success variable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:29 PM David Marchand wrote: > > From: Yunjian Wang > > > > This patch fixes an issue that uninitialized 'success' > > is used to be compared with '0'. > > > > Coverity issue: 337676 > > Fixes: 3340202f5954 ("stack: add lock-free implementation") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang > Reviewed-by: David Marchand Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand