From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F0145741
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Aug 2024 14:27:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AC6402B7;
	Mon,  5 Aug 2024 14:27:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com (mail-yb1-f180.google.com
 [209.85.219.180])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B598402AC;
 Mon,  5 Aug 2024 14:27:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id
 3f1490d57ef6-e0b10e8b6b7so8916286276.2; 
 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722860833; x=1723465633;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to;
 bh=zcIwOrWDg04rF9KgZcLTkgdY1pq1jAsIn45MrjreFYI=;
 b=sxVDq44tIx/hj6FCALEyoK3SY2bLPFkYaPmr24/TGUsDzOL4R7/NDWK4z2kI3Ufc8E
 CXzi8urIVzTVsOCwr+TEAy5rV99HrETs6ZLxwpMZ7KDqNERSafbkXeiZKrClv+7bw2lE
 1z3pWG46d6dp1SN++Lmt1+OWzdB6NXPUgqzZRjK+/NoxoSJJ4yuvJTW9UlsOlg2kx+Kd
 hkM1D0J6kOezx0oXmFvfa9ApoiiSdb1fWO0/TImkbzLEuIvlOWWgB1gAb1uIY6/I7vCo
 rQrYG/+y1GIdlucH/l/CVhb28cHj3Hii3Uf3KPgGKRJWL7yfwZeyWWeT6W6NYqe0P8oZ
 9Ksg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCWnyNI1GZwr9x0wZSKiejopIqMUYIcf12nNcu7b80hxuk8MNWP/tJLwEJbb1EUsMCaFlmaGdVLm8jG23aE=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxM3iW8J1E2h5wwvYHqCud9hWrsxD2t6DQmwN4BTOoJGoxYV9Ap
 eFS9LhMJLg4Sgfkvc6FNq0iTXfAo2VDEVZhF+SfSghPPSsEvWl6ObPJqHlIv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEfwZ6g0IP6f6PLH46VxOs15zEk/jzscEgCfmpixslDsT1LMz37G0AWfZAbVUffuSEycfF49Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:250f:b0:e0d:eb16:5616 with SMTP id
 3f1490d57ef6-e0deb1657femr6501899276.8.1722860833508; 
 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com.
 [209.85.128.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 3f1490d57ef6-e0be55985f7sm1372475276.63.2024.08.05.05.27.13
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id
 00721157ae682-68518bc1407so60609327b3.2; 
 Mon, 05 Aug 2024 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1;
 AJvYcCVD45tm2IadZzDEZoMNXfvDpNmwLov3C2Sm7ibzNymL/LgJP4mMjs2pkGUKfsCD4bPrqTnKEoQXZLu0ArE=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:5b06:0:b0:61e:a26:c1b2 with SMTP id
 00721157ae682-6896039ae96mr120132397b3.17.1722860833042; Mon, 05 Aug 2024
 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240731193710.3069297-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
 <CAGYh1E9yp1i_QZLAA04yd_-ZhsCeF==heZyD0bhjfy3Sq7VxTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGYh1E9yp1i_QZLAA04yd_-ZhsCeF==heZyD0bhjfy3Sq7VxTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:27:02 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAMw=ZnRK03kijQi8mgE-Q1wtNioyprrMW-_nZosCobja1zFhgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMw=ZnRK03kijQi8mgE-Q1wtNioyprrMW-_nZosCobja1zFhgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 22.11.6 patches review and test
To: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, 
 Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>, Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
 Chao Yang <chayang@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org

On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 06:45, YangHang Liu <yanghliu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> RedHat QE tested below 18 scenarios on RHEL 9.2 and didn't find any new dpdk issues.
>
> VM with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS
> VM with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS
> VM with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS
> PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS
> PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS
> PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS
> VM with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS
> vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server qemu reconnect: PASS
> vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server ovs reconnect: PASS
> PVP  reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: PASS
> PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS
> PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS
> VM with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS
> VM with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS
> VM with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS
> VM with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 4Q live migration testing: PASS
> Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS
> Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS
>
> Test Versions:
>
> qemu-kvm-7.2.0
> kernel 5.14
> libvirt 9.0
> openvswitch 3.1
> git log
>
> commit 2480dbd434234a40e7f999ced4650581fd64a24e
>
> Author: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@microsoft.com>
>
> Date: Wed Jul 31 20:35:00 2024 +0100
>
> version: 22.11.6-rc1
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
>
> Test device : X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G)
>
> Tested-by: Yanghang Liu<yanghliu@redhat.com>

Thank you!