From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6340AA00C4 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:06:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEF840A7B; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:06:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84240A7B for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:06:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1656691616; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J2SUFID04tHcW1Rc/j0gT5s617d91CIMATsbr0V89C4=; b=U6ogIWKkL6A/EW49k81Oxom1U3Uy/dwOrs9G+s2y3RDDeH/yxizqMRp1fm342QmOp1Pst2 hNuqAeODbPsh6vETUTcnp4o2ZCtznvZBgMSnxmHqqVfWEHDGVaiZQOpuuMTf+0F30+trcs /jKCVEsaf90CMjprjgI6enZqxIaVY3Y= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-282-S7C4cPe2Mdunvnfxz6Mjdg-1; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 12:06:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: S7C4cPe2Mdunvnfxz6Mjdg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o11-20020a056402438b00b0043676efd75dso2068416edc.16 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:06:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J2SUFID04tHcW1Rc/j0gT5s617d91CIMATsbr0V89C4=; b=noaMZQeDORjeTNArsrSsIOVOcR9gfLefS/0Foh9IdcBloSdMHIVOibuQX9XI/xfVNq vSgB4yx4O3MxoHGALliWXizCwBf8Go1wQawDkxQWPSkVul10l0KpjxizmEgFHUjvf/Rt Jwcs/Yh77PMTBT824N5kng2hzzh5xgbyuA3479NqaS26B23K28Z/lZS0ZcmERqGGC/HJ yXIJzw0BepNalnWdsgOcncKlj3fS/6dA4WNm3gKz4CK1/lCJMO7oKE8MAtc/n1Ty4WEQ 7b2BPxHG+HkOBmz3eCWOf+bv78iSnks/x4rnbfOLtl5ogqLbbbo0GZICjj0rbhYuDX8s eKuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/Wq2orFouISUd87vYaxJLkRn2gkF2kmcwlMr7uArepHU+d5Qgz eopCql5UjWFA0Ttqbll6KsonYaD2eITEeDJjYjcd+h7adBTDdqaYouhbsDVXOIkZu/lZkRlCZtJ JqhT5oisO+9rKvpLPNM/dLrE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f02:b0:718:bdf7:790d with SMTP id c2-20020a1709063f0200b00718bdf7790dmr15592827ejj.479.1656691613510; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:06:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1shhVRaoR2L/ErZHSm/luItf3Lyd4BI/AlHvZA+XMfiAE16tPeCjxmBmxbQGBkMgU9eXJ4hHvSi3pR9z+FHIp0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3f02:b0:718:bdf7:790d with SMTP id c2-20020a1709063f0200b00718bdf7790dmr15592814ejj.479.1656691613316; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:06:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220624163108.1884382-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Traynor Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:06:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: please help backporting some patches to stable release 21.11.2 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Niklas_S=C3=B6derlund?= Cc: dpdk stable , Luca Boccassi Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ktraynor@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 11:24 AM Niklas S=C3=B6derlund wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for your work! > > On 2022-06-24 17:31:08 +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > 417be15e5f Peng Zhang net/nfp: make sure MTU is never larger tha= n mbuf size > > I see this patch already in the 21.11 branch as > > commit 1c770fda6f6f3862 ("net/nfp: make sure MTU is never larger = than mbuf size") > > Is this patch picked up twice by the tooling since it had special care > in [1]? Or is it some action I need to take here that I'm missing? > Hi Niklas. No action needed, it was just my mistake to not remove this from this failed-to-apply list when I backported the 3 nfp commits. As you say, it is now pushed to the 21.11 branch as part of the nfp trilogy :-) thanks, Kevin. bf7aa26ddd net/nfp: fix initialization 1c770fda6f net/nfp: make sure MTU is never larger than mbuf size fe2cddeb08 net/nfp: update how max MTU is read > > 1. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2022-June/039130.html > > -- > Kind Regards, > Niklas S=C3=B6derlund >