From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.64]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8207322C for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 08:51:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Mellanox.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HyKg8KD1Jw1qqxo6AdIkwQKhVla6IkYeEzdOXP5QQPc=; b=VC+1ri3TmUpNYOa+SgZRlK3B/NPu5b0v0P6hbcsRHaFiv4xNMCSNpBaffOpCJfHCbTkOywWasfW5pCVUNrqoXRD83zDmFcLY6TxdyQanyCsVKSf+bcgt5YXU2V0nqVlOCrNFsen6QJq1/i7ADoFtTB6v+uGrL9qBA3LnMHp7/8A= Received: from DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.134.109.15) by DB7PR05MB4345.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.134.108.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.797.11; Tue, 29 May 2018 06:51:15 +0000 Received: from DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e57e:5e77:595f:d4f7]) by DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e57e:5e77:595f:d4f7%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0797.017; Tue, 29 May 2018 06:51:15 +0000 From: Shahaf Shuler To: Yuanhan Liu , Yongseok Koh CC: "luca.boccassi@gmail.com" , Wisam Monther , dpdk stable Thread-Topic: A missing mlx5 patch for stable 17.11 Thread-Index: AQHT8tofNuD2qIRJNEC6U7arTn0XnKRC7E6AgANeRvA= Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:51:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20180527031547.debfexmbbuwsl77m@yuanhanliu-NB0.tencent.com> In-Reply-To: <20180527031547.debfexmbbuwsl77m@yuanhanliu-NB0.tencent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=shahafs@mellanox.com; x-originating-ip: [193.47.165.251] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB7PR05MB4345; 7:d35aTKk+gawler9PHlb59Iqy1X+WNJh/j1rEidUAl3xPebE8AsnSJ8WL7bLunCqm+TpCB7nDJ1mDvZumFH3Da8TyeeZjnsMQAMl0YRMzg4E1c9noHJyNsEb2iNliGTYIl4F0r+wwz89HMiUAbk5p4CeO/rJJqfz1u5FprnZ6f5Lum66YT1r1WSQhKawJiCFejQZOyogRnrmwIlKFAYT7IgRra2V/Q02TTew4/hxMeLSUWtw+c029iNAoNKpKUaxL x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR05MB4345; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR05MB4345: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078)(45079756050767); x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:DB7PR05MB4345; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB7PR05MB4345; x-forefront-prvs: 0687389FB0 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(39380400002)(366004)(396003)(199004)(189003)(186003)(110136005)(54906003)(2906002)(4326008)(68736007)(81156014)(81166006)(486006)(8676002)(26005)(9686003)(446003)(6306002)(478600001)(14454004)(345774005)(39060400002)(53936002)(6246003)(102836004)(476003)(3280700002)(45080400002)(3660700001)(106356001)(8936002)(316002)(25786009)(966005)(6506007)(5250100002)(97736004)(105586002)(5660300001)(3846002)(6116002)(66066001)(76176011)(99286004)(55016002)(11346002)(6636002)(7736002)(6436002)(74316002)(305945005)(2900100001)(575784001)(86362001)(229853002)(33656002)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR05MB4345; H:DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mellanox.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: zdCkKmzVfzVNtR2/hBpzuLxqDZhdWLpLd5U5H0HfxagJIVbzM3+2jwAKmgOecfUetn3rOsV6lDBu86txllN1MlombDfvEa2tKZjHmNCFjxZ4oTVnraTsSKSky6yjCzyZRPZBGaM95R1fErJoeP4ZsMvi41J6BRaH/U8yaRoQpnI/OrI+oNbuno0DzXebXZlL spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: af0f4680-61b4-44fa-3fc7-08d5c5309285 X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: af0f4680-61b4-44fa-3fc7-08d5c5309285 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 May 2018 06:51:14.9007 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR05MB4345 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] A missing mlx5 patch for stable 17.11 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:51:17 -0000 Hi Yuanhan, Sunday, May 27, 2018 6:16 AM, Yuanhan Liu: > Subject: Re: A missing mlx5 patch for stable 17.11 >=20 > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:07:56PM +0000, Yongseok Koh wrote: > > Hi, Yuanhan > > > > There's one missing patch from upstream repo. It is because the patch > > doesn't have Cc tag. I should've asked when I acked it. > > > > Please push this one to the 17.11 queue for the next available release. > > I confirmed it can be applied without any conflict. >=20 > Hi Yongseok, >=20 > Thank you for letting me know that! I have now pushed it to dpdk- > stable/17.11. In fact there is a bunch of fixes that we plan to backport to 17.11. they a= re currently missing probably to rebase issues. We will send them out by EOW.=20 Thanks.=20 >=20 > --yliu > > > > > > commit 0915e287a6a7ed884a3de198f08926d8418366d4 > > Author: Bin Huang > > Date: Fri Mar 30 13:13:38 2018 +0800 > > > > net/mlx5: add packet type index for TCP ack > > > > According to CQE format: > > - l4_hdr_type: > > 0 - None > > 1 - TCP header was present in the packet > > 2 - UDP header was present in the packet > > 3 - TCP header was present in the packet with Empty > > TCP ACK indication. (TCP packet flag is set, > > and packet carries no data) > > 4 - TCP header was present in the packet with TCP ACK indicati= on. > > (TCP packet flag is set, and packet carries data). > > > > A packet should be identified as TCP packet if l4_hdr_type is 1, 3 = or 4. > > Add corresponding idx of TCP ACK to ptype table. > > > > previous discussion: > > > > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fw > ww > > .mail- > archive.com%2Fusers%40dpdk.org%2Fmsg02980.html&data=3D02%7C01%7Csh > > > ahafs%40mellanox.com%7C84449d300af3499abdfb08d5c3802afc%7Ca652971 > c7d2e > > > 4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636629877612129429&sdata=3DZqw10vw > 38CRcKU > > r0Jc25rM8ruEO7bP%2Fa5hHqOZ%2BB3EE%3D&reserved=3D0 > > > > Signed-off-by: Bin Huang > > Acked-by: Yongseok Koh > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Yongseok